PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PABFX vs. AYBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PABFX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PABFX achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 13.99% return. Over the past 10 years, PABFX has underperformed AYBLX with an annualized return of 9.99%, while AYBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.


PABFX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.26%
YTD
7.70%
6M
7.24%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
9.99%

AYBLX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.64%
YTD
13.99%
6M
13.54%
1Y
32.24%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PABFX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PABFX
PGIM Balanced Fund
7.70%15.83%19.80%17.08%-16.07%14.68%9.12%21.77%-5.16%14.36%
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
13.99%19.80%9.64%15.41%-14.39%15.48%12.92%22.22%-4.43%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PABFX and AYBLX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 1997

0.93

The correlation between PABFX and AYBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PABFX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PABFX
PABFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AYBLX
AYBLX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AYBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AYBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PABFX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PABFXAYBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.62

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

5.16

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.97

24.00

-10.03

PABFX vs. AYBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PABFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the AYBLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PABFX and AYBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PABFX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PABFX drawdown since its inception was -40.90%, which is greater than AYBLX's maximum drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABFX and AYBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PABFXAYBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.90%

-36.28%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-6.41%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-13.39%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.24%

-20.26%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.46%

-24.24%

-2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.52%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-3.78%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

1.38%

+0.13%

Volatility

PABFX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PABFXAYBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.63%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.36%

7.83%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

9.95%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.02%

11.13%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.65%

11.33%

+0.32%

PABFX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PABFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PABFX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison

PABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.89%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
3.24%3.58%2.59%1.76%3.23%8.61%4.12%6.03%9.97%9.42%2.63%4.14%
PABFX
PGIM Balanced Fund
8.89%9.57%13.25%2.35%2.09%12.40%1.66%5.18%7.55%5.78%4.79%8.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PABFX and AYBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AYBLX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to PABFX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PABFX dropped -40.90% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.

AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PABFX and AYBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer