PABD vs. UMMA
PABD (iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. PABD is passively managed, while UMMA is actively managed. Over the past year, PABD returned 19.72% vs 50.76% for UMMA. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PABD charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.
Performance
PABD vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PABD achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 29.52% return.
PABD
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 19.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMMA
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 29.52%
- 6M
- 30.57%
- 1Y
- 50.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PABD vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PABD iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF | 6.96% | 30.06% | 5.32% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 29.52% | 26.65% | 7.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PABD and UMMA is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PABD and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
PABD vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PABD
UMMA
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
PABD
UMMA
Industrials
PABD
UMMA
Technology
PABD
UMMA
Healthcare
PABD
UMMA
Real Estate
PABD
UMMA
Basic Materials
PABD
UMMA
Consumer Cyclical
PABD
UMMA
Consumer Defensive
PABD
UMMA
Utilities
PABD
UMMA
-
Communication Services
PABD
UMMA
Energy
PABD
UMMA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PABD vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank
PABD
UMMA
PABD vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF (PABD) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PABD | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.40 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 3.42 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.90 | 13.07 | -7.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PABD vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PABD drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABD and UMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PABD | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -34.17% | +20.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.55% | -14.93% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -5.07% | +3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -9.73% | +7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 3.89% | -0.54% |
Volatility
PABD vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF (PABD) is 5.21%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 12.08%. This indicates that PABD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PABD | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 12.08% | -6.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 20.30% | -6.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 22.74% | -6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 21.08% | -5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 21.08% | -5.42% |
PABD vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PABD has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PABD vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison
PABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than UMMA's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PABD iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF | 3.05% | 2.74% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 1.09% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PABD and UMMA have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMMA has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to PABD (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PABD dropped -13.37% vs UMMA's -34.17%.
On 1-year performance, UMMA leads with 50.76% vs 19.72% for PABD. On fees, PABD is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PABD has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 50.76% return vs 19.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PABD is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.
PABD has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.95% for UMMA.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PABD and 0.65% for UMMA.
UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PABD and UMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer