PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PABD vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PABD vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF (PABD) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PABD achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 34.43% return.


PABD

1D
0.74%
1M
0.67%
6M
5.53%
YTD
8.29%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
1.57%
1M
1.37%
6M
28.74%
YTD
34.43%
1Y
38.08%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
14.34%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PABD vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PABD and GSG is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024

-0.04

The correlation between PABD and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PABD vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PABD
PABD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PABD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PABD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PABD Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PABD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PABD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PABD vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF (PABD) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PABDGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.03

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.71

6.88

-1.17

PABD vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PABD Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PABD and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PABD vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PABD drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABD and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PABDGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-89.62%

+76.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-18.81%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-59.41%

+58.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-63.69%

+61.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

5.55%

-2.19%

Volatility

PABD vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF (PABD) is 3.85%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that PABD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PABDGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

7.37%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

21.54%

-7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

23.48%

-7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

22.80%

-7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

22.00%

-6.40%

PABD vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PABD has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PABD vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

PABD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


PABD and GSG have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to PABD (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PABD dropped -13.37% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 38.08% vs 19.12% for PABD. On fees, PABD is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PABD has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 38.08% return vs 19.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PABD is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

PABD has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

PABD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GSG is Commodities. PABD tracks MSCI World ex USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PABD and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PABD and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer