P vs. XTR
P (Everpure, Inc.) is a stock, while XTR (Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF) is Equity Hedged fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index. Over the past 3 years, P returned 33.14%/yr vs 18.55%/yr for XTR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
P vs. XTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, P achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than XTR's 8.67% return.
P
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 17.41%
- 1Y
- 47.33%
- 3Y*
- 33.14%
- 5Y*
- 34.04%
- 10Y*
- 21.32%
XTR
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
P vs. XTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P Everpure, Inc. | 20.64% | 9.08% | 72.27% | 33.26% | -17.79% | 36.54% |
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 8.67% | 13.66% | 21.85% | 21.16% | -17.67% | 4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between P and XTR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between P and XTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
P vs. XTR — Risk / Return Rank
P
XTR
P vs. XTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everpure, Inc. (P) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| P | XTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 2.70 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.22 | 11.51 | -9.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| P | XTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 2.14 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.72 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
P vs. XTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum P drawdown since its inception was -69.43%, which is greater than XTR's maximum drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for P and XTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| P | XTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.43% | -20.83% | -48.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.26% | -8.51% | -33.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.63% | -14.35% | -34.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.10% | -0.65% | -17.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -5.95% | -18.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.42% | 1.99% | +19.43% |
Volatility
P vs. XTR - Volatility Comparison
Everpure, Inc. (P) has a higher volatility of 26.95% compared to Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) at 2.99%. This indicates that P's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| P | XTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.95% | 2.99% | +23.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.58% | 8.16% | +46.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.12% | 10.76% | +56.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.45% | 13.78% | +38.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.04% | 13.78% | +37.26% |
Dividends
P vs. XTR - Dividend Comparison
P has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P Everpure, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 16.40% | 17.82% | 20.89% | 1.09% | 1.08% | 2.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
P and XTR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
P has higher volatility (26.95%) compared to XTR (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, P dropped -69.43% vs XTR's -20.83%.
XTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for P and XTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer