PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWMBX vs. OWLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OWMBX vs. OWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund (OWMBX) and Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies Fund (OWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWMBX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than OWLSX's 8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, OWMBX has underperformed OWLSX with an annualized return of 1.39%, while OWLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.65% annualized return.


OWMBX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.99%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.74%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
2.73%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
1.39%

OWLSX

1D
1.17%
1M
0.81%
YTD
8.37%
6M
8.47%
1Y
22.63%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
10.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWMBX vs. OWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OWMBX
Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund
0.57%4.29%0.43%4.03%-5.39%-0.63%5.01%5.58%0.87%2.22%
OWLSX
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies Fund
8.37%17.61%20.86%19.74%-22.15%17.26%15.36%25.19%-8.59%19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between OWMBX and OWLSX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 1998

-0.09

The correlation between OWMBX and OWLSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWMBX vs. OWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWMBX
OWMBX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
OWMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
OWMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

OWLSX
OWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
OWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
OWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWMBX vs. OWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund (OWMBX) and Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies Fund (OWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OWMBXOWLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

2.23

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

0.33

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.21

0.39

+4.83

OWMBX vs. OWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWMBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the OWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWMBX and OWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OWMBX vs. OWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWMBX drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum OWLSX drawdown of -68.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWMBX and OWLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWMBXOWLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-68.17%

+58.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.45%

-68.17%

+65.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.81%

-68.17%

+64.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.37%

-68.17%

+58.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.44%

-68.17%

+58.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-63.12%

+62.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-19.64%

+18.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

57.11%

-56.26%

Volatility

OWMBX vs. OWLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund (OWMBX) is 0.38%, while Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies Fund (OWLSX) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that OWMBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWMBXOWLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

4.93%

-4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.45%

10.10%

-8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90%

214.15%

-212.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.11%

96.93%

-93.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.04%

69.49%

-66.45%

OWMBX vs. OWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWMBX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than OWLSX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

OWMBX vs. OWLSX - Dividend Comparison

OWMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than OWLSX's 11.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OWLSX
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies Fund
11.54%12.51%5.79%0.55%0.61%6.60%1.38%4.94%4.65%5.86%1.81%2.40%
OWMBX
Old Westbury Municipal Bond Fund
2.60%2.61%2.54%2.01%1.15%2.06%2.55%1.68%1.45%1.18%1.61%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


OWMBX and OWLSX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OWLSX has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to OWMBX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWMBX dropped -9.54% vs OWLSX's -68.17%.

OWMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWMBX and OWLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer