OWNS vs. ASEC
OWNS (CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF) and ASEC (American Century Securitized Credit ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OWNS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for ASEC.
Performance
OWNS vs. ASEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OWNS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASEC
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OWNS vs. ASEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
OWNS CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF | 0.09% |
ASEC American Century Securitized Credit ETF | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between OWNS and ASEC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OWNS vs. ASEC — Risk / Return Rank
OWNS
ASEC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OWNS vs. ASEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and American Century Securitized Credit ETF (ASEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OWNS | ASEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OWNS vs. ASEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWNS drawdown since its inception was -5.39%, which is greater than ASEC's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNS and ASEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWNS | ASEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -0.46% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.01% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.55% | -0.18% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | — | — |
Volatility
OWNS vs. ASEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OWNS | ASEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 1.48% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 1.48% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.35% | 1.48% | +3.87% |
OWNS vs. ASEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
OWNS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ASEC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
OWNS vs. ASEC - Dividend Comparison
OWNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than ASEC's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ASEC American Century Securitized Credit ETF | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OWNS CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF | 4.33% | 4.12% | 3.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OWNS and ASEC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASEC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASEC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for OWNS.
OWNS has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.45% for ASEC.
They also come from different issuers: CCM and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for OWNS and 0.29% for ASEC.
Find the right allocation for OWNS and ASEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer