OWNB vs. CLNK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OWNB (Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF) and CLNK (Bitwise Chainlink ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OWNB is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations Inde, while CLNK is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Chainlink (LINK) spot price. Both are passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OWNB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for CLNK.

Performance

OWNB vs. CLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

OWNB

• 1D: -2.77%
• 1M: -11.48%
• YTD: -9.32%
• 6M: -15.24%
• 1Y: -34.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLNK

• 1D: -4.58%
• 1M: -20.30%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWNB vs. CLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF	-22.46%
CLNK Bitwise Chainlink ETF	-45.91%

Correlation

The correlation between OWNB and CLNK is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026	0.76

Return for Risk

OWNB vs. CLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWNB

OWNB Risk / Return Rank: 4
OWNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OWNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OWNB Omega Ratio Rank: 5
OWNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
OWNB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

CLNK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWNB vs. CLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) and Bitwise Chainlink ETF (CLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OWNB	CLNK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.62	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.97	—	—

Drawdowns

OWNB vs. CLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWNB drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than CLNK's maximum drawdown of -48.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNB and CLNK.

Drawdown Indicators

	OWNB	CLNK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.47%	-48.04%	-11.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.91%	-46.41%	-2.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.71%	-33.42%	+7.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OWNB	CLNK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.85%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.05%	67.99%	-9.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.38%	67.99%	-5.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.38%	67.99%	-5.61%

OWNB vs. CLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWNB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CLNK's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

OWNB vs. CLNK - Dividend Comparison

OWNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while CLNK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CLNK Bitwise Chainlink ETF	0.00%	0.00%
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF	0.96%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OWNB and CLNK in my portfolio?

OWNB and CLNK have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, OWNB or CLNK?

On fees, CLNK is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OWNB or CLNK?

CLNK is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for OWNB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OWNB or CLNK?

OWNB has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for CLNK.

What is the main difference between OWNB and CLNK?

OWNB is categorized as Blockchain, while CLNK is Cryptocurrency. OWNB tracks Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations Inde, while CLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK) spot price. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for OWNB and 0.34% for CLNK.