OWL vs. BCI

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

OWL (Blue Owl Capital Inc.) is a stock, while BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Over the past 5 years, OWL returned -1.37%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for BCI. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

OWL vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWL achieves a -32.79% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 20.84% return.

OWL

• 1D: 3.55%
• 1M: -0.62%
• 6M: -34.37%
• YTD: -32.79%
• 1Y: -46.41%
• 3Y*: -1.17%
• 5Y*: -1.37%
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 0.94%
• 6M: 15.80%
• YTD: 20.84%
• 1Y: 30.10%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: 10.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWL vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc.	-32.79%	-32.83%	61.76%	47.40%	-26.29%	32.18%	5.86%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	20.84%	15.07%	5.47%	-8.79%	15.09%	26.18%	4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between OWL and BCI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020	0.15

The correlation between OWL and BCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OWL vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWL

OWL Risk / Return Rank: 9
OWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
OWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
OWL Omega Ratio Rank: 8
OWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
OWL Martin Ratio Rank: 13

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 59
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWL vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OWL	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.03	1.75	-2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.60	2.31	-3.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.31	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	2.04	-2.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	6.78	-8.05

OWL vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWL Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWL and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OWL vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWL drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWL and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	OWL	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.10%	-32.69%	-34.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.59%	-14.82%	-43.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.10%	-14.82%	-52.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.10%	-26.50%	-40.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.64%	-8.92%	-51.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.68%	-11.99%	-12.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.58%	4.45%	+32.13%

Volatility

OWL vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 4.71%. This indicates that OWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OWL	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.10%	4.71%	+7.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.47%	15.02%	+20.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.06%	17.31%	+27.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.06%	16.83%	+25.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.76%	15.66%	+27.10%

Dividends

OWL vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

OWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%, less than BCI's 13.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.64%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc.	9.41%	5.72%	2.92%	3.69%	4.06%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OWL and BCI in my portfolio?

OWL and BCI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OWL or BCI?

OWL has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to BCI (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWL dropped -67.10% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.