OWL vs. ATH.TO
OWL (Blue Owl Capital Inc.) and ATH.TO (Athabasca Oil Corporation) are both stocks. OWL operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while ATH.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, OWL returned -3.88%/yr vs 55.47%/yr for ATH.TO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OWL vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
OWL is traded in USD, while ATH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OWL achieves a -40.47% return, which is significantly lower than ATH.TO's 39.89% return.
OWL
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -17.12%
- YTD
- -40.47%
- 6M
- -41.68%
- 1Y
- -53.07%
- 3Y*
- -5.39%
- 5Y*
- -3.88%
- 10Y*
- —
ATH.TO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- YTD
- 39.89%
- 6M
- 40.02%
- 1Y
- 74.64%
- 3Y*
- 49.11%
- 5Y*
- 55.47%
- 10Y*
- 20.58%
OWL vs. ATH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. | -40.47% | -32.83% | 61.76% | 47.40% | -26.29% | 32.18% | 5.86% |
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 39.89% | 38.20% | 17.84% | 77.25% | 90.45% | 600.35% | -5.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between OWL and ATH.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020 | 0.18 |
The correlation between OWL and ATH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OWL:
$5.80B
ATH.TO:
CA$4.95B
OWL:
$0.13
ATH.TO:
CA$0.45
OWL:
65.98
ATH.TO:
22.82
OWL:
0.24
ATH.TO:
0.87
OWL:
1.95
ATH.TO:
3.71
OWL:
2.76
ATH.TO:
2.68
OWL:
$2.94B
ATH.TO:
CA$1.35B
OWL:
$1.99B
ATH.TO:
CA$518.18M
OWL:
$876.72M
ATH.TO:
CA$505.02M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OWL vs. ATH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
OWL
ATH.TO
OWL vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OWL | ATH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.32 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 3.24 | -4.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 10.81 | -12.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OWL vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWL drawdown since its inception was -67.10%, smaller than the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWL and ATH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWL | ATH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.10% | -99.59% | +32.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.59% | -23.14% | -35.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | -29.96% | -37.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.10% | -47.55% | -19.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.14% | -62.47% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.41% | -76.83% | +52.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.05% | 6.93% | +28.12% |
Volatility
OWL vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) have volatilities of 13.41% and 13.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OWL | ATH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.41% | 13.05% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.97% | 31.88% | +3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.46% | 37.71% | +6.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 49.97% | -7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.76% | 61.94% | -19.18% |
Dividends
OWL vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison
OWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, while ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OWL Blue Owl Capital Inc. | 10.62% | 5.72% | 2.92% | 3.69% | 4.06% | 0.87% |
Financials
OWL vs. ATH.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Owl Capital Inc. and Athabasca Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OWL vs. ATH.TO - Profitability Comparison
OWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported a gross profit of 753.81M and revenue of 753.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
ATH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 134.91M and revenue of 377.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.
OWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported an operating income of 109.49M and revenue of 753.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.
ATH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 90.74M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
OWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Capital Inc. reported a net income of 15.54M and revenue of 753.81M, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
ATH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OWL and ATH.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for OWL and ATH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer