PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWACX vs. CTCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OWACX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund (OWACX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWACX achieves a 8.13% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 31.05% return. Over the past 10 years, OWACX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 14.04%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


OWACX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.17%
YTD
8.13%
6M
7.38%
1Y
18.54%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
14.04%

CTCAX

1D
0.16%
1M
7.90%
YTD
31.05%
6M
29.88%
1Y
57.54%
3Y*
35.16%
5Y*
19.49%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWACX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OWACX
Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund
8.13%10.45%21.30%25.93%-22.18%25.76%23.61%32.10%-4.02%20.93%
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
31.05%24.78%31.39%56.46%-34.81%22.73%49.46%43.91%-1.48%42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between OWACX and CTCAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.85

The correlation between OWACX and CTCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWACX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWACX
OWACX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
OWACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWACX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
OWACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWACX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CTCAX
CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWACX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund (OWACX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OWACXCTCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.42

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

4.11

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

14.63

-5.31

OWACX vs. CTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the CTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWACX and CTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OWACX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWACX drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWACX and CTCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWACXCTCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-61.04%

+27.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-14.43%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-26.67%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.11%

-39.55%

+11.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

-39.55%

+5.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.76%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-10.67%

+5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

4.05%

-1.83%

Volatility

OWACX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund (OWACX) is 4.79%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 11.61%. This indicates that OWACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWACXCTCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

11.61%

-6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.70%

19.35%

-8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.47%

23.45%

-9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

26.38%

-8.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

25.06%

-6.53%

OWACX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OWACX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

OWACX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison

OWACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than CTCAX's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
2.51%3.29%1.08%2.36%3.53%4.15%0.91%2.55%5.82%3.52%0.36%1.80%
OWACX
Old Westbury All Cap Core Fund
8.18%8.18%10.64%8.40%2.54%5.90%3.18%9.22%5.05%1.99%1.08%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


OWACX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTCAX has higher volatility (11.61%) compared to OWACX (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWACX dropped -34.01% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.

CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWACX and CTCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer