PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVM vs. TAXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OVM vs. TAXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) and BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVM achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than TAXM's 1.10% return.


OVM

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.30%
6M
2.33%
YTD
3.62%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*

TAXM

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.24%
6M
0.58%
YTD
1.10%
1Y
6.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVM vs. TAXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OVM and TAXM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025

0.67

The correlation between OVM and TAXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVM vs. TAXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVM
OVM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
OVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
OVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXM
TAXM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TAXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXM Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVM vs. TAXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) and BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OVMTAXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

2.24

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.57

7.66

+7.90

OVM vs. TAXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the TAXM Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVM and TAXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OVM vs. TAXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than TAXM's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVM and TAXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVMTAXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-3.10%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-2.70%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.88%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-0.70%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

0.79%

-0.15%

Volatility

OVM vs. TAXM - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents (TAXM) at 0.57%. This indicates that OVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVMTAXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

0.57%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

2.11%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

2.66%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.42%

3.45%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.51%

3.45%

+3.06%

OVM vs. TAXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

OVM vs. TAXM - Dividend Comparison

OVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than TAXM's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
OVM
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
5.29%5.45%4.91%4.66%4.21%6.10%3.97%0.58%
TAXM
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware ETF for Massachusetts Residents
3.28%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OVM and TAXM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVM has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to TAXM (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVM dropped -15.58% vs TAXM's -3.10%.

On 1-year performance, OVM leads with 9.97% vs 6.02% for TAXM. On fees, TAXM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TAXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OVM has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAXM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.

OVM has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 3.28% for TAXM.

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for OVM and 0.35% for TAXM.

OVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVM and TAXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer