OVM vs. IBMN
OVM (Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF) and IBMN (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. OVM is actively managed, while IBMN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OVM returned 1.59%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBMN. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OVM charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMN.
Performance
OVM vs. IBMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OVM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- —
IBMN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
OVM vs. IBMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF | 3.96% | 4.14% | 3.42% | 7.35% | -11.26% | 4.22% | 6.17% | 1.72% |
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 2.49% | 2.33% | 2.42% | -4.43% | -0.41% | 4.83% | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between OVM and IBMN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.36 |
The correlation between OVM and IBMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OVM vs. IBMN — Risk / Return Rank
OVM
IBMN
OVM vs. IBMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OVM | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.66 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.86 | 6.02 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.92 | 24.21 | -5.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OVM | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.12 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.28 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.58 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
OVM vs. IBMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OVM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than IBMN's maximum drawdown of -12.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVM and IBMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OVM | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -12.40% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -0.25% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.20% | -1.10% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.58% | -7.36% | -8.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.05% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -1.81% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.10% | +0.53% |
Volatility
OVM vs. IBMN - Volatility Comparison
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) at 0.00%. This indicates that OVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OVM | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 0.00% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.36% | 0.50% | +2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 0.71% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 1.80% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 3.89% | +2.66% |
OVM vs. IBMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
OVM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMN's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
OVM vs. IBMN - Dividend Comparison
OVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than IBMN's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 1.14% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 1.72% | 0.97% | 0.70% | 1.11% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF | 6.11% | 5.45% | 4.91% | 4.66% | 4.21% | 6.10% | 3.97% | 0.58% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OVM and IBMN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OVM has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to IBMN (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVM dropped -15.58% vs IBMN's -12.40%.
On 5-year performance, OVM leads with 1.59% vs 0.47% for IBMN. On fees, IBMN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMN has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OVM has performed better with a 1.59% return vs 0.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBMN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.
OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 1.14% for IBMN.
They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for OVM and 0.18% for IBMN.
OVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OVM and IBMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer