OVM vs. GMUN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OVM (Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF) and GMUN (Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. OVM is actively managed, while GMUN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OVM returned 5.37%/yr vs 3.06%/yr for GMUN. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OVM charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GMUN.

Performance

OVM vs. GMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) and Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVM achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly higher than GMUN's -0.34% return.

OVM

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: 4.16%
• 1Y: 11.81%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 1.59%
• 10Y*: —

GMUN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: -0.34%
• 6M: 0.04%
• 1Y: 4.92%
• 3Y*: 3.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVM vs. GMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF	3.96%	4.14%	3.42%	6.75%
GMUN Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF	-0.34%	5.92%	0.31%	3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between OVM and GMUN is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023	0.65

The correlation between OVM and GMUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OVM vs. GMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVM

OVM Risk / Return Rank: 88
OVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
OVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
OVM Omega Ratio Rank: 90
OVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
OVM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

GMUN

GMUN Risk / Return Rank: 55
GMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
GMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 81
GMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
GMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVM vs. GMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) and Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OVM	GMUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.04	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.24	2.79	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.49	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.86	1.75	+3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.92	5.36	+13.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OVM vs. GMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the GMUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVM and GMUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OVM	GMUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	2.04	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.99	-0.57

Drawdowns

OVM vs. GMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than GMUN's maximum drawdown of -4.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVM and GMUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	OVM	GMUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-4.35%	-11.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.44%	-2.83%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.20%	-3.37%	-4.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-2.29%	+2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-1.02%	-2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	0.92%	-0.29%

Volatility

OVM vs. GMUN - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF (GMUN) at 1.09%. This indicates that OVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OVM	GMUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	1.09%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.36%	2.00%	+1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	2.42%	+1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.39%	2.96%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.55%	2.96%	+3.59%

OVM vs. GMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than GMUN's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

OVM vs. GMUN - Dividend Comparison

OVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than GMUN's 3.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GMUN Goldman Sachs Community Municipal Bond ETF	3.12%	2.94%	3.22%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF	6.11%	5.45%	4.91%	4.66%	4.21%	6.10%	3.97%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OVM and GMUN in my portfolio?

OVM and GMUN have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OVM or GMUN?

OVM has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to GMUN (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVM dropped -15.58% vs GMUN's -4.35%.

Which ETF is better, OVM or GMUN?

On 3-year performance, OVM leads with 5.37% vs 3.06% for GMUN. On fees, GMUN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GMUN has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OVM or GMUN?

Over the 3-year period, OVM has performed better with a 5.37% return vs 3.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OVM or GMUN?

GMUN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OVM or GMUN?

OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 3.12% for GMUN.

What is the main difference between OVM and GMUN?

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for OVM and 0.15% for GMUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.