OVM vs. APMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OVM (Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF) and APMU (ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OVM returned 5.37%/yr vs 3.03%/yr for APMU. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OVM charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for APMU.

Performance

OVM vs. APMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) and ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVM achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly higher than APMU's 0.44% return.

OVM

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: 4.16%
• 1Y: 11.81%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 1.59%
• 10Y*: —

APMU

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.72%
• 1Y: 4.28%
• 3Y*: 3.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVM vs. APMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF	3.96%	4.14%	3.42%	3.83%
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	0.44%	4.50%	0.86%	1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between OVM and APMU is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2023	0.57

The correlation between OVM and APMU shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OVM vs. APMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVM

OVM Risk / Return Rank: 88
OVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
OVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
OVM Omega Ratio Rank: 90
OVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
OVM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

APMU

APMU Risk / Return Rank: 49
APMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
APMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
APMU Omega Ratio Rank: 63
APMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
APMU Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVM vs. APMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) and ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OVM	APMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.81	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.24	2.62	+1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.38	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.86	1.79	+3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.92	5.30	+13.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OVM vs. APMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the APMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVM and APMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OVM	APMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	1.81	+1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.82	-0.39

Drawdowns

OVM vs. APMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than APMU's maximum drawdown of -4.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVM and APMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	OVM	APMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-4.39%	-11.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.44%	-2.40%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.20%	-3.41%	-4.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-1.17%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-0.93%	-3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	0.81%	-0.18%

Volatility

OVM vs. APMU - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (APMU) at 0.75%. This indicates that OVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OVM	APMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	0.75%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.36%	1.68%	+1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	2.37%	+1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.39%	2.81%	+2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.55%	2.81%	+3.74%

OVM vs. APMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than APMU's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

OVM vs. APMU - Dividend Comparison

OVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than APMU's 2.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
APMU ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	2.66%	2.63%	2.42%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF	6.11%	5.45%	4.91%	4.66%	4.21%	6.10%	3.97%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OVM and APMU in my portfolio?

OVM and APMU have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OVM or APMU?

OVM has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to APMU (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVM dropped -15.58% vs APMU's -4.39%.

Which ETF is better, OVM or APMU?

On 3-year performance, OVM leads with 5.37% vs 3.03% for APMU. On fees, APMU is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, APMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OVM or APMU?

Over the 3-year period, OVM has performed better with a 5.37% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OVM or APMU?

APMU is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OVM or APMU?

OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 2.66% for APMU.

What is the main difference between OVM and APMU?

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and ActivePassive. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for OVM and 0.36% for APMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.