PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVL vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OVL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVL achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return.


OVL

1D
-0.94%
1M
5.25%
YTD
13.20%
6M
13.15%
1Y
33.24%
3Y*
24.25%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OVL
Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF
13.20%17.81%27.91%28.01%-22.18%32.40%20.17%10.84%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between OVL and DGRO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.85

The correlation between OVL and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OVL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OVL
DGRO

Technology

35.7%
19.4%

Financial Services

11.6%
21.2%

Communication Services

11.3%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
5.7%

Healthcare

8.5%
16.4%

Industrials

8.3%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
11.5%

Energy

3.5%
5.6%

Utilities

2.4%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.5%

Technology

OVL
35.7%
DGRO
19.4%

Financial Services

OVL
11.6%
DGRO
21.2%

Communication Services

OVL
11.3%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

OVL
10.2%
DGRO
5.7%

Healthcare

OVL
8.5%
DGRO
16.4%

Industrials

OVL
8.3%
DGRO
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

OVL
4.9%
DGRO
11.5%

Energy

OVL
3.5%
DGRO
5.6%

Utilities

OVL
2.4%
DGRO
6.9%

Real Estate

OVL
1.9%
DGRO

-

Basic Materials

OVL
1.8%
DGRO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVL
OVL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
OVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
OVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OVLDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

3.50

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.04

13.52

+3.51

OVL vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVL Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVL and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OVLDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.39

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.77

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.76

+0.03

Drawdowns

OVL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVL drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVL and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVLDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-35.10%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-6.47%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.73%

-14.03%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-19.31%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.28%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-3.44%

-3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.67%

+0.29%

Volatility

OVL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that OVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVLDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.21%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

6.91%

+3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

9.48%

+4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

13.82%

+5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

16.62%

+5.92%

OVL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

OVL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

OVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
OVL
Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF
6.18%2.99%3.10%3.33%3.85%3.63%2.43%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OVL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVL has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVL dropped -35.49% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, OVL leads with 14.26% vs 10.54% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OVL has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OVL.

OVL has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OVL and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVL and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer