PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVF vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OVF vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF (OVF) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVF achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.


OVF

1D
-0.99%
1M
4.77%
YTD
14.61%
6M
17.49%
1Y
33.00%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVF vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OVF
Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF
14.61%33.03%6.40%15.25%-17.64%9.56%2.65%5.81%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between OVF and YCS is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

-0.20

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between OVF and YCS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.20 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVF vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVF
OVF Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
OVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVF Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
OVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVF vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF (OVF) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OVFYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.97

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

12.40

-1.41

OVF vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVF Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVF and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OVFYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.92

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

1.12

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.33

+0.23

Drawdowns

OVF vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVF drawdown since its inception was -30.07%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVF and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVFYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.07%

-49.56%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-8.30%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.89%

-23.05%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-27.32%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-19.93%

+12.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.66%

+0.35%

Volatility

OVF vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF (OVF) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that OVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVFYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

2.75%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.08%

12.32%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.75%

17.27%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.77%

21.10%

-5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

19.01%

-1.89%

OVF vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

OVF vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

OVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.57%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
OVF
Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF
9.57%6.32%5.13%5.17%4.50%4.88%2.55%2.12%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OVF and YCS have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVF has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVF dropped -30.07% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.54% vs 9.56% for OVF. On fees, OVF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.54% return vs 9.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OVF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

OVF has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

OVF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OVF and 1.00% for YCS.

OVF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVF and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer