PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVCHY vs. KT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OVCHY vs. KT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR (OVCHY) and KT Corporation (KT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVCHY achieves a 21.10% return, which is significantly higher than KT's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, OVCHY has outperformed KT with an annualized return of 17.14%, while KT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.93% annualized return.


OVCHY

1D
-1.27%
1M
4.32%
YTD
21.10%
6M
30.73%
1Y
52.46%
3Y*
33.96%
5Y*
20.56%
10Y*
17.14%

KT

1D
1.19%
1M
-11.76%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
2.50%
1Y
-3.10%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVCHY vs. KT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OVCHY
Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR
21.10%33.93%33.06%15.54%11.75%14.29%-1.22%1.15%-8.35%59.34%
KT
KT Corporation
-0.64%27.73%19.93%5.01%13.34%21.00%-5.09%-18.42%-8.90%10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between OVCHY and KT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2010

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OVCHY:

$82.88B

KT:

$10.39B

EPS

OVCHY:

$4.85

KT:

$3.14K

PE Ratio

OVCHY:

7.53

KT:

0.01

PEG Ratio

OVCHY:

0.67

KT:

0.00

PS Ratio

OVCHY:

3.17

KT:

0.00

PB Ratio

OVCHY:

1.34

KT:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

OVCHY:

$26.07B

KT:

$28.39T

Gross Profit (TTM)

OVCHY:

$26.07B

KT:

$15.90T

EBITDA (TTM)

OVCHY:

$13.10B

KT:

$5.41T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVCHY vs. KT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVCHY
OVCHY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
OVCHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVCHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVCHY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
OVCHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVCHY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

KT
KT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
KT Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
KT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
KT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVCHY vs. KT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR (OVCHY) and KT Corporation (KT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OVCHYKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.99

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.56

-0.11

+6.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.26

-0.30

+17.56

OVCHY vs. KT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVCHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the KT Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVCHY and KT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OVCHYKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

-0.14

+2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.46

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.26

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.03

+0.45

Drawdowns

OVCHY vs. KT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVCHY drawdown since its inception was -45.62%, smaller than the maximum KT drawdown of -85.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVCHY and KT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVCHYKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.62%

-85.64%

+40.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-27.30%

+19.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

-27.30%

+9.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-27.30%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.62%

-64.03%

+18.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-48.22%

+43.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-65.89%

+55.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

10.41%

-7.36%

Volatility

OVCHY vs. KT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR (OVCHY) is 4.96%, while KT Corporation (KT) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that OVCHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVCHYKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

7.40%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

16.83%

-4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

21.95%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.82%

22.55%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.04%

23.34%

+1.70%

Dividends

OVCHY vs. KT - Dividend Comparison

OVCHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than KT's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KT
KT Corporation
3.34%4.24%3.50%5.29%5.40%6.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.49%1.84%
OVCHY
Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR
4.21%4.78%5.25%6.07%4.55%3.35%3.79%3.83%3.08%3.93%8.07%3.64%

Financials

OVCHY vs. KT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR and KT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T202120222023202420252026
8.70B
6.98T
(OVCHY) Total Revenue
(KT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OVCHY vs. KT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR and KT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
100.0%
32.7%
Portfolio components
OVCHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 8.70B and revenue of 8.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

KT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.28T and revenue of 6.98T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

OVCHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 4.51B and revenue of 8.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.8%.

KT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported an operating income of 492.09B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

OVCHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR reported a net income of 3.71B and revenue of 8.70B, resulting in a net margin of 42.6%.

KT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a net income of 399.91B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OVCHY and KT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KT has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to OVCHY (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVCHY dropped -45.62% vs KT's -85.64%.

OVCHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVCHY and KT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer