OUSA vs. DBC
OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OUSA is a Quality Factor fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OUSA returned 10.53%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for DBC. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
OUSA vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 27.37% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has outperformed DBC with an annualized return of 10.53%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.90% annualized return.
OUSA
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 16.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.84%
DBC
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 17.73%
- YTD
- 27.37%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.84M | $30.72M | $31.47M | |
| $787.13K | $1.27M | $1.35M |
OUSA vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 8.40% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 6.96% | 25.03% | -3.11% | 18.81% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 27.37% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSA and DBC is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.20 |
The correlation between OUSA and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSA vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
OUSA
DBC
OUSA vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OUSA | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.12 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | 6.91 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OUSA vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSA | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -76.36% | +43.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -16.54% | +8.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -16.54% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.54% | -27.34% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -41.71% | +8.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -26.32% | +26.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -46.06% | +42.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 5.07% | -2.68% |
Volatility
OUSA vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 3.82%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSA | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 7.61% | -3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.10% | 16.61% | -8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 19.70% | -9.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 19.33% | -5.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 17.89% | -2.70% |
OUSA vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSA vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than DBC's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.61% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.33% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSA and DBC have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to OUSA (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs DBC's -76.36%.
On 10-year performance, OUSA leads with 10.53% vs 8.90% for DBC. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.33% for OUSA.
OUSA is categorized as Quality Factor, while DBC is Commodities. OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.85% for DBC.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSA and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer