OUNZ vs. QQQ
OUNZ (VanEck Merk Gold Trust) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OUNZ is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OUNZ returned 12.64%/yr vs 21.59%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OUNZ charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
OUNZ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUNZ achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.71% return. Over the past 10 years, OUNZ has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 12.64%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.59% annualized return.
OUNZ
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 30.33%
- 3Y*
- 29.90%
- 5Y*
- 17.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
OUNZ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust | 0.29% | 63.95% | 26.75% | 12.83% | -0.51% | -4.00% | 24.71% | 18.00% | -2.06% | 12.82% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUNZ and QQQ is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2014 | 0.02 |
The correlation between OUNZ and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OUNZ vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OUNZ
QQQ
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
OUNZ
QQQ
Basic Materials
OUNZ
-
QQQ
Communication Services
OUNZ
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
OUNZ
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
OUNZ
-
QQQ
Energy
OUNZ
-
QQQ
Financial Services
OUNZ
-
QQQ
Healthcare
OUNZ
-
QQQ
Industrials
OUNZ
-
QQQ
Technology
OUNZ
-
QQQ
Utilities
OUNZ
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUNZ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
OUNZ
QQQ
OUNZ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OUNZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 3.00 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 11.43 | -7.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OUNZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 2.15 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.76 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.97 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.40 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
OUNZ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUNZ drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUNZ and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUNZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -82.97% | +61.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.00% | -11.96% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.00% | -22.77% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -35.12% | +14.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.76% | -35.12% | +13.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.83% | -4.03% | -15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -32.77% | +25.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 3.14% | +4.82% |
Volatility
OUNZ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) is 5.67%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that OUNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUNZ | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 6.84% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.29% | 13.20% | +10.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.66% | 16.74% | +9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 22.49% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 22.36% | -6.36% |
OUNZ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUNZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
OUNZ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
OUNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUNZ and QQQ have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to OUNZ (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUNZ dropped -21.77% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 12.64% for OUNZ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, OUNZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for OUNZ.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for OUNZ.
OUNZ is categorized as Precious Metals, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. OUNZ tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Merk and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OUNZ and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUNZ and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer