PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTRFX vs. QMLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OTRFX vs. QMLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OnTrack Core Fund (OTRFX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTRFX achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than QMLFX's 18.90% return. Over the past 10 years, OTRFX has underperformed QMLFX with an annualized return of 5.28%, while QMLFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


OTRFX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.71%
YTD
4.68%
6M
5.71%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
5.28%

QMLFX

1D
1.05%
1M
9.25%
YTD
18.90%
6M
16.97%
1Y
38.33%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTRFX vs. QMLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OTRFX
OnTrack Core Fund
4.68%6.12%-0.12%5.37%-5.82%3.94%29.03%6.86%-4.70%6.49%
QMLFX
Quantified Market Leaders Fund
18.90%0.97%11.05%15.04%-23.59%13.22%37.81%26.08%-13.48%16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between OTRFX and QMLFX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2013

0.45

The correlation between OTRFX and QMLFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (5 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTRFX vs. QMLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTRFX
OTRFX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
OTRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
OTRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

QMLFX
QMLFX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QMLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QMLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTRFX vs. QMLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OnTrack Core Fund (OTRFX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OTRFXQMLFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.90

1.94

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.94

2.52

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.33

+0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

3.91

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.84

11.54

-2.70

OTRFX vs. QMLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the QMLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTRFX and QMLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OTRFXQMLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

1.94

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.03

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.47

0.50

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.42

+0.84

Drawdowns

OTRFX vs. QMLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTRFX drawdown since its inception was -9.73%, smaller than the maximum QMLFX drawdown of -36.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTRFX and QMLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTRFXQMLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.73%

-36.59%

+26.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-10.07%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.76%

-27.21%

+21.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.51%

-36.59%

+27.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.51%

-36.59%

+27.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

0.00%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.97%

-12.54%

+9.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

3.41%

-2.06%

Volatility

OTRFX vs. QMLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OnTrack Core Fund (OTRFX) is 0.36%, while Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that OTRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTRFXQMLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

7.62%

-7.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

14.34%

-11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

20.52%

-16.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.06%

20.23%

-17.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

20.97%

-17.35%

OTRFX vs. QMLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTRFX has a 2.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QMLFX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

OTRFX vs. QMLFX - Dividend Comparison

OTRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.46%, more than QMLFX's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OTRFX
OnTrack Core Fund
12.46%13.04%8.01%0.14%1.39%7.10%2.36%1.38%7.15%2.69%7.05%6.15%
QMLFX
Quantified Market Leaders Fund
1.15%1.37%0.00%1.99%0.00%26.84%9.58%0.00%15.63%12.15%2.22%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


OTRFX and QMLFX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMLFX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to OTRFX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTRFX dropped -9.73% vs QMLFX's -36.59%.

OTRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTRFX and QMLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer