PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTRFX vs. DNAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OTRFX vs. DNAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OnTrack Core Fund (OTRFX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTRFX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than DNAVX's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, OTRFX has outperformed DNAVX with an annualized return of 5.38%, while DNAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.77% annualized return.


OTRFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.93%
YTD
5.21%
6M
5.12%
1Y
11.62%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
5.38%

DNAVX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.35%
1Y
2.41%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
3.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTRFX vs. DNAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OTRFX
OnTrack Core Fund
5.21%6.12%-0.12%5.37%-5.82%3.94%29.03%6.86%-4.70%6.49%
DNAVX
Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund
1.42%5.12%6.13%18.70%-14.02%9.29%1.63%13.99%-8.44%8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between OTRFX and DNAVX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2013

0.36

The correlation between OTRFX and DNAVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.38 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTRFX vs. DNAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTRFX
OTRFX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
OTRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
OTRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DNAVX
DNAVX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DNAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DNAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTRFX vs. DNAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OnTrack Core Fund (OTRFX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OTRFXDNAVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.11

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

0.95

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

3.16

+5.27

OTRFX vs. DNAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the DNAVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTRFX and DNAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OTRFX vs. DNAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTRFX drawdown since its inception was -9.73%, smaller than the maximum DNAVX drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTRFX and DNAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTRFXDNAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.73%

-17.73%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-2.73%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.76%

-8.05%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.51%

-17.12%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.51%

-17.73%

+8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-2.73%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.97%

-3.87%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

0.82%

+0.57%

Volatility

OTRFX vs. DNAVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OnTrack Core Fund (OTRFX) is 0.53%, while Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that OTRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTRFXDNAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

1.22%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

3.64%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

4.14%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.07%

8.62%

-5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

8.41%

-4.82%

OTRFX vs. DNAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTRFX has a 2.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DNAVX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

OTRFX vs. DNAVX - Dividend Comparison

OTRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.40%, more than DNAVX's 11.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNAVX
Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund
11.40%11.56%0.00%3.41%0.00%0.00%0.75%0.00%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OTRFX
OnTrack Core Fund
12.40%13.04%8.01%0.14%1.39%7.10%2.36%1.38%7.15%2.69%7.05%6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


OTRFX and DNAVX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNAVX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to OTRFX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTRFX dropped -9.73% vs DNAVX's -17.73%.

OTRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTRFX and DNAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer