PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTPIX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OTPIX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund (OTPIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTPIX achieves a 16.78% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's 5.31% return.


OTPIX

1D
3.34%
1M
-0.02%
6M
18.62%
YTD
16.78%
1Y
27.45%
3Y*
-22.48%
5Y*
-11.62%
10Y*
4.83%
ALL TIME*
5.74%

SWLGX

1D
2.78%
1M
1.04%
6M
9.82%
YTD
5.31%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

OTPIX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OTPIX
ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund
16.78%18.08%-69.20%51.66%-34.36%48.75%45.00%36.58%-1.75%-2.56%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
5.31%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between OTPIX and SWLGX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.96

The correlation between OTPIX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTPIX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OTPIX
OTPIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
OTPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
OTPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OTPIX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund (OTPIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OTPIXSWLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.14

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

0.83

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

2.49

+4.19

OTPIX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTPIX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OTPIX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTPIX drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTPIX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTPIXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.55%

-32.69%

-46.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-16.16%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.55%

-23.30%

-56.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.55%

-32.69%

-46.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.20%

-3.40%

-61.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.08%

-7.02%

-16.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

5.41%

-1.43%

Volatility

OTPIX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund (OTPIX) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 7.12%. This indicates that OTPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTPIXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

7.12%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.29%

14.42%

+1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.56%

17.73%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.06%

21.86%

+20.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.38%

22.70%

+10.68%

OTPIX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTPIX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

OTPIX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

OTPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than SWLGX's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
OTPIX
ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund
1.48%1.72%0.76%0.00%0.00%18.31%1.10%0.87%0.00%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.43%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, OTPIX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OTPIX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to SWLGX (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTPIX dropped -79.55% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

OTPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTPIX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer