OTGL vs. EWW
OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) and EWW (iShares MSCI Mexico ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - OTGL tracks the Actively Managed while EWW tracks the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OTGL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWW.
Performance
OTGL vs. EWW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTGL achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than EWW's 8.00% return.
OTGL
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWW
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
OTGL vs. EWW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 4.23% | 13.64% |
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 8.00% | 17.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between OTGL and EWW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTGL vs. EWW — Risk / Return Rank
OTGL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EWW
OTGL vs. EWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) and iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OTGL | EWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OTGL vs. EWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTGL drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, smaller than the maximum EWW drawdown of -64.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTGL and EWW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTGL | EWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -64.94% | +51.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -7.82% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -18.49% | +15.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.99% | — |
Volatility
OTGL vs. EWW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OTGL | EWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 21.83% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 22.59% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 25.31% | -6.08% |
OTGL vs. EWW - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTGL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EWW's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
OTGL vs. EWW - Dividend Comparison
OTGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than EWW's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 3.34% | 3.48% | 4.39% | 2.19% | 3.64% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 1.77% | 2.34% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 2.86% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OTGL and EWW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EWW is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EWW is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.
EWW has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.86% for OTGL.
OTGL tracks Actively Managed, while EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: OTG and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OTGL and 0.49% for EWW.
Find the right allocation for OTGL and EWW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer