OTGL vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OTGL is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. OTGL is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. OTGL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

OTGL vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTGL achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.83% return.

OTGL

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 6M: 6.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTGL vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF	5.36%	13.64%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.83%	1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between OTGL and CSHP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

OTGL vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTGL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTGL vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OTGL	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	11.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	27.60	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	6.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	65.45	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	381.67	—

Drawdowns

OTGL vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTGL drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTGL and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	OTGL	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.52%	-0.08%	-13.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.20%	-0.04%	-9.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-0.00%	-3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OTGL	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.23%	0.36%	+18.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.23%	0.41%	+18.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.23%	0.41%	+18.82%

OTGL vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTGL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

OTGL vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

OTGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.91%	5.39%	1.96%
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF	2.83%	1.89%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OTGL and CSHP in my portfolio?

OTGL and CSHP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, OTGL or CSHP?

On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OTGL or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OTGL or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.83% for OTGL.

What is the main difference between OTGL and CSHP?

OTGL is categorized as Latin America Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: OTG and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OTGL and 0.20% for CSHP.