OTGL vs. BILS
OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) and BILS (SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OTGL is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while BILS is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. OTGL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILS.
Performance
OTGL vs. BILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTGL achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 1.57% return.
OTGL
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- —
OTGL vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 5.36% | 13.64% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.57% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between OTGL and BILS is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTGL vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank
OTGL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BILS
OTGL vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OTGL | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 34.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 127.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1,285.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OTGL vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTGL drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTGL and BILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTGL | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -0.41% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | 0.00% | -9.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -0.04% | -3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
OTGL vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OTGL | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 0.23% | +19.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 0.31% | +18.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 0.30% | +18.93% |
OTGL vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTGL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
OTGL vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison
OTGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than BILS's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 1.61% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 2.83% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OTGL and BILS have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BILS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BILS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.
BILS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.83% for OTGL.
OTGL is categorized as Latin America Equities, while BILS is Ultrashort Bond. OTGL tracks Actively Managed, while BILS tracks Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: OTG and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OTGL and 0.14% for BILS.
Find the right allocation for OTGL and BILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer