OTF vs. APO
OTF (Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp) and APO (Apollo Global Management, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past year, OTF returned -25.26% vs 2.12% for APO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OTF vs. APO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTF achieves a -25.20% return, which is significantly lower than APO's -5.82% return.
OTF
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- -25.20%
- 6M
- -20.13%
- 1Y
- -25.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APO
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- -5.82%
- 6M
- -8.43%
- 1Y
- 2.12%
- 3Y*
- 24.76%
- 5Y*
- 20.75%
- 10Y*
- 29.69%
OTF vs. APO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OTF Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp | -25.20% | -8.23% |
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | -5.82% | 5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between OTF and APO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.38 |
Fundamentals
OTF:
$4.87B
APO:
$80.45B
OTF:
$2.33
APO:
$3.58
OTF:
4.51
APO:
37.75
OTF:
0.01
APO:
0.10
OTF:
2.97
APO:
2.73
OTF:
0.64
APO:
4.34
OTF:
$1.24B
APO:
$29.68B
OTF:
$661.92M
APO:
$26.52B
OTF:
$802.86M
APO:
$9.28B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTF vs. APO — Risk / Return Rank
OTF
APO
OTF vs. APO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) and Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OTF | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.04 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 0.06 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.79 | 0.13 | -1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OTF vs. APO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTF drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum APO drawdown of -56.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTF and APO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTF | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.36% | -56.99% | +25.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.96% | -34.97% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.36% | -22.60% | -8.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -16.39% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.11% | 16.76% | -2.65% |
Volatility
OTF vs. APO - Volatility Comparison
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) has a higher volatility of 9.54% compared to Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) at 8.25%. This indicates that OTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OTF | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.54% | 8.25% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.01% | 27.00% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.98% | 35.30% | -3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.97% | 37.14% | -5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.97% | 37.85% | -5.88% |
Dividends
OTF vs. APO - Dividend Comparison
OTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.27%, more than APO's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 1.55% | 1.38% | 1.10% | 1.81% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 4.72% | 4.23% | 7.86% | 5.53% | 6.46% | 12.91% |
OTF Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp | 15.27% | 7.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
OTF vs. APO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp and Apollo Global Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OTF vs. APO - Profitability Comparison
OTF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 310.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
APO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.93B and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
OTF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 310.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
APO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
OTF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported a net income of 171.31M and revenue of 310.42M, resulting in a net margin of 55.2%.
APO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a net income of -1.91B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of -38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OTF and APO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OTF has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to APO (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTF dropped -31.36% vs APO's -56.99%.
APO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OTF and APO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer