PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTF vs. AMDI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OTF vs. AMDI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) and IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTF achieves a -25.11% return, which is significantly lower than AMDI.L's 81.71% return.


OTF

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.10%
6M
-23.05%
YTD
-25.11%
1Y
-26.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-28.82%

AMDI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-10.31%
6M
73.37%
YTD
81.71%
1Y
100.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19,255.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTF vs. AMDI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OTF
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp
-25.11%-1.59%
AMDI.L
IncomeShares AMD Options ETP
81.71%12,701.59%

Correlation

The correlation between OTF and AMDI.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTF vs. AMDI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTF
OTF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
OTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTF Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
OTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTF Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDI.L
AMDI.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AMDI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTF vs. AMDI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) and IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OTFAMDI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.31

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

2.13

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.75

3.62

-5.37

OTF vs. AMDI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTF Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the AMDI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTF and AMDI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OTF vs. AMDI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTF drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum AMDI.L drawdown of -47.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTF and AMDI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTFAMDI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-47.34%

+14.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.99%

-47.34%

+19.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.28%

-16.92%

-14.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.86%

-21.04%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.31%

27.81%

-12.50%

Volatility

OTF vs. AMDI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) is 6.99%, while IncomeShares AMD Options ETP (AMDI.L) has a volatility of 25.65%. This indicates that OTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTFAMDI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

25.65%

-18.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.27%

47.18%

-20.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.37%

75.40%

-43.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.50%

9,750.24%

-9,718.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.50%

9,750.24%

-9,718.74%

Dividends

OTF vs. AMDI.L - Dividend Comparison

OTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%, less than AMDI.L's 52.97% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AMDI.L
IncomeShares AMD Options ETP
52.97%8.85%
OTF
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp
15.76%7.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


OTF and AMDI.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTF and AMDI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer