OTCAX vs. SSMHX
OTCAX (MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund) and SSMHX (State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, OTCAX returned 11.74%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for SSMHX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OTCAX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SSMHX.
Performance
OTCAX vs. SSMHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTCAX achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than SSMHX's 14.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with OTCAX having a 11.74% annualized return and SSMHX not far behind at 11.63%.
OTCAX
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- -1.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
SSMHX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 15.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
OTCAX vs. SSMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTCAX MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund | 2.89% | 3.32% | 23.47% | 21.00% | -28.53% | 13.66% | 35.34% | 37.43% | 0.82% | 25.95% |
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio | 14.79% | 12.90% | 10.73% | 25.21% | -25.43% | 13.08% | 32.46% | 28.00% | -9.21% | 18.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between OTCAX and SSMHX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2015 | 0.88 |
The correlation between OTCAX and SSMHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTCAX vs. SSMHX — Risk / Return Rank
OTCAX
SSMHX
OTCAX vs. SSMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OTCAX | SSMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.24 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 2.39 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 8.53 | -8.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OTCAX vs. SSMHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTCAX drawdown since its inception was -74.39%, which is greater than SSMHX's maximum drawdown of -41.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCAX and SSMHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTCAX | SSMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.39% | -41.61% | -32.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.46% | -10.03% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.05% | -30.38% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.85% | -34.84% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.85% | -41.61% | +4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.85% | -2.65% | -2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.05% | -9.06% | -13.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 2.80% | +3.70% |
Volatility
OTCAX vs. SSMHX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio (SSMHX) at 3.81%. This indicates that OTCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OTCAX | SSMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 3.81% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.47% | 13.16% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 17.42% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 22.50% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 22.36% | -2.36% |
OTCAX vs. SSMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTCAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SSMHX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
OTCAX vs. SSMHX - Dividend Comparison
OTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.29%, more than SSMHX's 6.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTCAX MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund | 16.29% | 16.76% | 15.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.64% | 0.83% | 0.86% | 4.70% | 8.80% | 5.67% | 2.84% |
SSMHX State Street Small/Mid Cap Equity Index Portfolio | 6.21% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 2.31% | 16.30% | 2.91% | 3.65% | 6.43% | 4.01% | 1.71% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, OTCAX and SSMHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
OTCAX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to SSMHX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCAX dropped -74.39% vs SSMHX's -41.61%.
SSMHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OTCAX and SSMHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer