PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTCAX vs. NEEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OTCAX vs. NEEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTCAX achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than NEEIX's 59.61% return.


OTCAX

1D
0.61%
1M
3.80%
YTD
4.87%
6M
3.45%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
12.24%

NEEIX

1D
4.73%
1M
16.98%
YTD
59.61%
6M
57.27%
1Y
98.30%
3Y*
30.88%
5Y*
16.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTCAX vs. NEEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OTCAX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.87%3.32%23.47%21.00%-28.53%13.66%35.34%37.43%0.82%25.14%
NEEIX
Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class
59.61%9.32%19.26%27.30%-33.26%28.13%42.39%43.15%-10.13%8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between OTCAX and NEEIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.82

The correlation between OTCAX and NEEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTCAX vs. NEEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTCAX
OTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
OTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
OTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

NEEIX
NEEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NEEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTCAX vs. NEEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OTCAXNEEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

3.83

-3.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

4.35

-3.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.57

-0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

7.85

-7.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.79

26.70

-25.91

OTCAX vs. NEEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the NEEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTCAX and NEEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OTCAXNEEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

3.83

-3.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.58

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.67

-0.28

Drawdowns

OTCAX vs. NEEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTCAX drawdown since its inception was -74.39%, which is greater than NEEIX's maximum drawdown of -43.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCAX and NEEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTCAXNEEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.39%

-43.11%

-31.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.46%

-13.22%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-36.13%

+15.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.85%

-43.11%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

0.00%

-3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.13%

-10.87%

-12.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

3.88%

+2.51%

Volatility

OTCAX vs. NEEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) is 4.19%, while Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEEIX) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that OTCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTCAXNEEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

9.69%

-5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

20.89%

-7.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

27.10%

-10.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

28.31%

-8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

25.79%

-5.83%

OTCAX vs. NEEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTCAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEIX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

OTCAX vs. NEEIX - Dividend Comparison

OTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.98%, more than NEEIX's 4.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEEIX
Needham Growth Fund Institutional Class
4.49%7.16%7.48%0.00%1.72%6.70%5.58%11.09%17.58%9.64%0.00%0.00%
OTCAX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund
15.98%16.76%15.59%0.00%0.00%3.64%0.83%0.86%4.70%8.80%5.67%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


OTCAX and NEEIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEEIX has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to OTCAX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCAX dropped -74.39% vs NEEIX's -43.11%.

NEEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.83 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTCAX and NEEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer