OTCAX vs. FDCPX
OTCAX (MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund) and FDCPX (Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio) are both mutual funds - OTCAX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by MFS, while FDCPX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, OTCAX returned 11.74%/yr vs 26.11%/yr for FDCPX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OTCAX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FDCPX.
Performance
OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTCAX achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than FDCPX's 60.54% return. Over the past 10 years, OTCAX has underperformed FDCPX with an annualized return of 11.74%, while FDCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.11% annualized return.
OTCAX
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- -1.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
FDCPX
- 1D
- -4.25%
- 1M
- -12.81%
- 6M
- 52.09%
- YTD
- 60.54%
- 1Y
- 98.23%
- 3Y*
- 48.19%
- 5Y*
- 26.73%
- 10Y*
- 26.11%
OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTCAX MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund | 2.89% | 3.32% | 23.47% | 21.00% | -28.53% | 13.66% | 35.34% | 37.43% | 0.82% | 25.95% |
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio | 60.54% | 54.44% | 22.40% | 33.52% | -28.63% | 23.68% | 46.07% | 40.15% | -6.30% | 32.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between OTCAX and FDCPX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 1993 | 0.79 |
The correlation between OTCAX and FDCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTCAX vs. FDCPX — Risk / Return Rank
OTCAX
FDCPX
OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OTCAX | FDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.51 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 5.97 | -5.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 26.76 | -26.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTCAX drawdown since its inception was -74.39%, smaller than the maximum FDCPX drawdown of -81.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCAX and FDCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTCAX | FDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.39% | -81.96% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.46% | -17.02% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.05% | -23.59% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.85% | -35.29% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.85% | -35.29% | -1.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.85% | -17.02% | +12.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.05% | -26.07% | +3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 3.79% | +2.71% |
Volatility
OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) is 4.99%, while Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) has a volatility of 15.21%. This indicates that OTCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OTCAX | FDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 15.21% | -10.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.47% | 27.27% | -12.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 30.32% | -12.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 24.00% | -3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 22.59% | -2.59% |
OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTCAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FDCPX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Dividend Comparison
OTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.29%, more than FDCPX's 6.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio | 6.66% | 14.38% | 7.58% | 0.51% | 17.72% | 16.95% | 8.81% | 12.15% | 23.69% | 10.50% | 6.57% | 4.53% |
OTCAX MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund | 16.29% | 16.76% | 15.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.64% | 0.83% | 0.86% | 4.70% | 8.80% | 5.67% | 2.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OTCAX and FDCPX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDCPX has higher volatility (15.21%) compared to OTCAX (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCAX dropped -74.39% vs FDCPX's -81.96%.
FDCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OTCAX and FDCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer