PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTCAX vs. FDCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTCAX achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than FDCPX's 84.16% return. Over the past 10 years, OTCAX has underperformed FDCPX with an annualized return of 12.24%, while FDCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.33% annualized return.


OTCAX

1D
0.61%
1M
3.80%
YTD
4.87%
6M
3.45%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
12.24%

FDCPX

1D
2.20%
1M
25.35%
YTD
84.16%
6M
86.77%
1Y
143.33%
3Y*
57.11%
5Y*
29.98%
10Y*
28.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OTCAX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.87%3.32%23.47%21.00%-28.53%13.66%35.34%37.43%0.82%25.95%
FDCPX
Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio
84.16%54.44%22.40%33.52%-28.63%23.68%46.07%40.15%-6.30%32.64%

Correlation

The correlation between OTCAX and FDCPX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 1993

0.79

The correlation between OTCAX and FDCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTCAX vs. FDCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTCAX
OTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
OTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
OTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FDCPX
FDCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FDCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FDCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OTCAXFDCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.89

-0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

15.12

-14.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.79

58.21

-57.42

OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the FDCPX Sharpe Ratio of 6.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTCAX and FDCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OTCAXFDCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

6.14

-5.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

1.34

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

1.30

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.56

-0.18

Drawdowns

OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTCAX drawdown since its inception was -74.39%, smaller than the maximum FDCPX drawdown of -81.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCAX and FDCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTCAXFDCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.39%

-81.96%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.46%

-9.68%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-23.59%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.85%

-35.29%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-35.29%

-1.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

0.00%

-3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.13%

-26.12%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

2.51%

+3.88%

Volatility

OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) is 4.19%, while Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) has a volatility of 8.07%. This indicates that OTCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTCAXFDCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

8.07%

-3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

19.85%

-6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

23.87%

-7.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

22.51%

-2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

21.91%

-1.95%

OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTCAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FDCPX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

OTCAX vs. FDCPX - Dividend Comparison

OTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.98%, more than FDCPX's 5.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDCPX
Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio
5.81%14.38%7.58%0.51%17.72%16.95%8.81%12.15%23.69%10.50%6.57%4.53%
OTCAX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund
15.98%16.76%15.59%0.00%0.00%3.64%0.83%0.86%4.70%8.80%5.67%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


OTCAX and FDCPX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDCPX has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to OTCAX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCAX dropped -74.39% vs FDCPX's -81.96%.

FDCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.14 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTCAX and FDCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer