PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GMIN.TO vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GMIN.TO vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GMIN.TO vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GMIN.TO
G Mining Ventures Corp
17.67%284.17%21.08%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
10.24%221.63%16.02%
Different Trading Currencies

GMIN.TO is traded in CAD, while GDMN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDMN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GMIN.TO achieves a 17.67% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's 10.24% return.


GMIN.TO

1D
13.64%
1M
-12.60%
YTD
17.67%
6M
76.56%
1Y
160.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDMN

1D
9.26%
1M
-26.30%
YTD
10.24%
6M
31.51%
1Y
132.14%
3Y*
66.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GMIN.TO vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMIN.TO
GMIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GMIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GMIN.TO vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GMIN.TOGDMNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

2.15

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.72

2.31

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

3.54

+1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.09

12.23

-0.15

GMIN.TO vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GMIN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GMIN.TO and GDMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GMIN.TOGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.15

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.37

1.06

+1.31

Correlation

The correlation between GMIN.TO and GDMN is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GMIN.TO vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

GMIN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.


TTM2025202420232022
GMIN.TO
G Mining Ventures Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.48%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%

Drawdowns

GMIN.TO vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.19%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -49.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMIN.TO and GDMN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GMIN.TOGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.19%

-52.82%

+18.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.19%

-39.03%

+4.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.94%

-28.60%

+12.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-18.45%

+9.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.28%

11.39%

+1.89%

Volatility

GMIN.TO vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

G Mining Ventures Corp (GMIN.TO) has a higher volatility of 29.29% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) at 24.65%. This indicates that GMIN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GMIN.TOGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.29%

24.65%

+4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.73%

52.72%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.32%

61.94%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.69%

44.69%

+13.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.69%

44.69%

+13.00%