PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSTFX vs. MUHLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSTFX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Osterweis Fund (OSTFX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSTFX achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 11.07% return. Over the past 10 years, OSTFX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 11.87%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.74% annualized return.


OSTFX

1D
0.81%
1M
0.38%
6M
4.99%
YTD
6.99%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
11.87%
ALL TIME*
10.48%

MUHLX

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.21%
6M
3.72%
YTD
11.07%
1Y
23.76%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
10.74%
ALL TIME*
9.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

OSTFX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OSTFX
Osterweis Fund
6.99%12.85%13.48%22.64%-22.01%22.58%23.20%43.39%-7.85%14.82%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
11.07%17.82%3.38%13.92%2.89%28.98%11.96%14.39%-13.29%18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between OSTFX and MUHLX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1993

0.78

The correlation between OSTFX and MUHLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSTFX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OSTFX
OSTFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
OSTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
OSTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MUHLX
MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OSTFX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osterweis Fund (OSTFX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSTFXMUHLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.17

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

6.42

-0.52

OSTFX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSTFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSTFX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSTFX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSTFX drawdown since its inception was -40.63%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSTFX and MUHLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSTFXMUHLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.63%

-62.05%

+21.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-10.23%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.80%

-18.63%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.62%

-18.63%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.54%

-40.85%

+8.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-3.96%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-10.75%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.46%

-1.14%

Volatility

OSTFX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

Osterweis Fund (OSTFX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSTFXMUHLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.75%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

10.86%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

14.48%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.65%

14.49%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

17.04%

-0.25%

OSTFX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSTFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

OSTFX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

OSTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than MUHLX's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
3.00%3.34%0.58%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%
OSTFX
Osterweis Fund
5.59%5.98%14.93%4.01%7.81%12.83%5.48%14.46%29.80%43.97%7.35%22.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


OSTFX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OSTFX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to MUHLX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSTFX dropped -40.63% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

MUHLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSTFX and MUHLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer