OSS vs. WLDS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) and Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS).

Performance

OSS vs. WLDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) and Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OSS vs. WLDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
OSS One Stop Systems, Inc.	5.43%	114.33%	59.52%	-30.23%	-14.97%
WLDS Wearable Devices Ltd.	-57.89%	-86.93%	-68.31%	-21.18%	-84.69%

Fundamentals

EPS OSS : -$0.31 WLDS : -$91.64
PS Ratio OSS : 2.80 WLDS : 0.21
Total Revenue (TTM) OSS : $60.26M WLDS : $1.17M
Gross Profit (TTM) OSS : $17.48M WLDS : -$126.00K
EBITDA (TTM) OSS : -$4.95M WLDS : -$15.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSS achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly higher than WLDS's -57.89% return.

OSS

• 1D: 4.99%
• 1M: -8.30%
• YTD: 5.43%
• 6M: 41.23%
• 1Y: 226.29%
• 3Y*: 45.06%
• 5Y*: 2.32%
• 10Y*: —

WLDS

• 1D: 20.00%
• 1M: -37.00%
• YTD: -57.89%
• 6M: -90.14%
• 1Y: -74.33%
• 3Y*: -77.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

OSS vs. WLDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSS

OSS Risk / Return Rank: 92
OSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
OSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
OSS Omega Ratio Rank: 87
OSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
OSS Martin Ratio Rank: 93

WLDS

WLDS Risk / Return Rank: 44
WLDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
WLDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
WLDS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
WLDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
WLDS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSS vs. WLDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) and Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OSS	WLDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	-0.17	+2.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.28	+0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.24	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.59	-0.80	+6.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.58	-1.16	+14.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OSS vs. WLDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSS Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the WLDS Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSS and WLDS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OSS	WLDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	-0.17	+2.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	-0.29	+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between OSS and WLDS is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

OSS vs. WLDS - Dividend Comparison

Neither OSS nor WLDS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

OSS vs. WLDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSS drawdown since its inception was -83.61%, smaller than the maximum WLDS drawdown of -99.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSS and WLDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	OSS	WLDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.61%	-99.83%	+16.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.32%	-95.75%	+57.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.24%	-99.80%	+64.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.42%	-85.79%	+30.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.77%	65.60%	-49.83%

Volatility

OSS vs. WLDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS) is 27.23%, while Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS) has a volatility of 29.58%. This indicates that OSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OSS	WLDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.23%	29.58%	-2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.97%	72.90%	+4.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	100.47%	431.68%	-331.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.39%	281.68%	-204.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.48%	281.68%	-200.20%

Financials