PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSEA vs. EFFE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSEA vs. EFFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSEA achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than EFFE's 29.22% return.


OSEA

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.06%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.49%
1Y
7.05%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
10Y*

EFFE

1D
-0.18%
1M
17.03%
YTD
29.22%
6M
28.14%
1Y
44.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSEA vs. EFFE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OSEA
Harbor International Compounders ETF
0.79%18.49%-1.18%
EFFE
Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
29.22%22.42%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between OSEA and EFFE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.67

The correlation between OSEA and EFFE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSEA vs. EFFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSEA
OSEA Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
OSEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSEA Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
OSEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSEA Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

EFFE
EFFE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EFFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFFE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EFFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFFE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSEA vs. EFFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OSEAEFFEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.47

2.22

-1.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

2.96

-2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.41

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

3.25

-2.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.29

12.62

-10.33

OSEA vs. EFFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSEA Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the EFFE Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSEA and EFFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OSEAEFFEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

2.22

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.85

-1.07

Drawdowns

OSEA vs. EFFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSEA drawdown since its inception was -18.14%, which is greater than EFFE's maximum drawdown of -13.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSEA and EFFE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSEAEFFEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.14%

-13.75%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-13.75%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-0.18%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-1.98%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.53%

-0.44%

Volatility

OSEA vs. EFFE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) is 5.42%, while Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that OSEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSEAEFFEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

9.71%

-4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

17.67%

-5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

20.09%

-4.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

19.91%

-3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

19.91%

-3.29%

OSEA vs. EFFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSEA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EFFE's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

OSEA vs. EFFE - Dividend Comparison

OSEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than EFFE's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EFFE
Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
3.63%4.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OSEA
Harbor International Compounders ETF
1.23%1.24%0.51%0.65%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


OSEA and EFFE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFFE has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to OSEA (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSEA dropped -18.14% vs EFFE's -13.75%.

On 1-year performance, EFFE leads with 44.45% vs 7.05% for OSEA. On fees, OSEA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, OSEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EFFE has performed better with a 44.45% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OSEA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for EFFE.

EFFE has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 1.23% for OSEA.

OSEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EFFE is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for OSEA and 0.69% for EFFE.

EFFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSEA and EFFE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer