OSEA vs. EFFE
OSEA (Harbor International Compounders ETF) and EFFE (Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OSEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while EFFE is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Harbor. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OSEA returned 7.05% vs 44.45% for EFFE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OSEA charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for EFFE.
Performance
OSEA vs. EFFE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSEA achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than EFFE's 29.22% return.
OSEA
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFFE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 17.03%
- YTD
- 29.22%
- 6M
- 28.14%
- 1Y
- 44.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OSEA vs. EFFE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OSEA Harbor International Compounders ETF | 0.79% | 18.49% | -1.18% |
EFFE Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF | 29.22% | 22.42% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSEA and EFFE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between OSEA and EFFE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSEA vs. EFFE — Risk / Return Rank
OSEA
EFFE
OSEA vs. EFFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OSEA | EFFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 2.22 | -1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 2.96 | -2.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.41 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 3.25 | -2.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.29 | 12.62 | -10.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OSEA | EFFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 2.22 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.85 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
OSEA vs. EFFE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSEA drawdown since its inception was -18.14%, which is greater than EFFE's maximum drawdown of -13.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSEA and EFFE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSEA | EFFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.14% | -13.75% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -13.75% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.02% | -0.18% | -2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -1.98% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.53% | -0.44% |
Volatility
OSEA vs. EFFE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) is 5.42%, while Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that OSEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFFE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSEA | EFFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 9.71% | -4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 17.67% | -5.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.13% | 20.09% | -4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 19.91% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 19.91% | -3.29% |
OSEA vs. EFFE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSEA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EFFE's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
OSEA vs. EFFE - Dividend Comparison
OSEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than EFFE's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFFE Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF | 3.63% | 4.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OSEA Harbor International Compounders ETF | 1.23% | 1.24% | 0.51% | 0.65% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OSEA and EFFE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFFE has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to OSEA (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSEA dropped -18.14% vs EFFE's -13.75%.
On 1-year performance, EFFE leads with 44.45% vs 7.05% for OSEA. On fees, OSEA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, OSEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EFFE has performed better with a 44.45% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OSEA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for EFFE.
EFFE has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 1.23% for OSEA.
OSEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EFFE is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for OSEA and 0.69% for EFFE.
EFFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSEA and EFFE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer