PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSEA vs. DISV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSEA vs. DISV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSEA achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than DISV's 13.10% return.


OSEA

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.49%
6M
0.27%
YTD
0.69%
1Y
9.18%
3Y*
7.19%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.41%

DISV

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.88%
6M
6.01%
YTD
13.10%
1Y
32.14%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.18M$14.28M$13.10M
$1.60M$1.39M$1.57M

OSEA vs. DISV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OSEA
Harbor International Compounders ETF
0.69%18.49%-0.73%20.88%10.14%
DISV
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF
13.10%47.42%5.87%19.52%10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between OSEA and DISV is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.76

The correlation between OSEA and DISV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

OSEA vs. DISV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OSEA
DISV

Technology

18.9%
4.4%

Industrials

16.2%
15.2%

Financial Services

15.3%
22.2%

Healthcare

11.6%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.6%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
16.2%

Basic Materials

5.3%
21.8%

Utilities

3.5%
0.8%

Communication Services

3.1%
4.1%

Energy

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Technology

OSEA
18.9%
DISV
4.4%

Industrials

OSEA
16.2%
DISV
15.2%

Financial Services

OSEA
15.3%
DISV
22.2%

Healthcare

OSEA
11.6%
DISV
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

OSEA
9.6%
DISV
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

OSEA
5.6%
DISV
16.2%

Basic Materials

OSEA
5.3%
DISV
21.8%

Utilities

OSEA
3.5%
DISV
0.8%

Communication Services

OSEA
3.1%
DISV
4.1%

Energy

OSEA

-

DISV
4.2%

Real Estate

OSEA

-

DISV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSEA vs. DISV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OSEA
OSEA Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
OSEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSEA Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
OSEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSEA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DISV
DISV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OSEA vs. DISV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSEADISVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.38

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

2.55

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

8.98

-6.52

OSEA vs. DISV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSEA Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the DISV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSEA and DISV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSEA vs. DISV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSEA drawdown since its inception was -18.14%, smaller than the maximum DISV drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSEA and DISV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSEADISVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.14%

-26.77%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-12.69%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-14.15%

-3.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-0.52%

-2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-4.84%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.60%

-0.21%

Volatility

OSEA vs. DISV - Volatility Comparison

Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSEADISVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

4.03%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

12.65%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

14.92%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

17.28%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

17.28%

-0.67%

OSEA vs. DISV - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSEA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DISV's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

OSEA vs. DISV - Dividend Comparison

OSEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than DISV's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DISV
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF
2.44%2.69%2.77%2.73%1.23%
OSEA
Harbor International Compounders ETF
1.23%1.24%0.51%0.65%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


OSEA and DISV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OSEA has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to DISV (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSEA dropped -18.14% vs DISV's -26.77%.

On 3-year performance, DISV leads with 22.91% vs 7.19% for OSEA. On fees, DISV is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, DISV has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DISV has performed better with a 22.91% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DISV is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for OSEA.

DISV has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.23% for OSEA.

OSEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DISV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for OSEA and 0.42% for DISV.

DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSEA and DISV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer