PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSCX vs. COTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSCX vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long OSCR ETF (OSCX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSCX achieves a 98.93% return, which is significantly higher than COTG's 20.04% return.


OSCX

1D
29.35%
1M
58.35%
YTD
98.93%
6M
33.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COTG

1D
2.32%
1M
-9.84%
YTD
20.04%
6M
10.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSCX vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OSCX and COTG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSCX vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long OSCR ETF (OSCX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OSCX vs. COTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OSCXCOTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

-0.21

+0.17

Drawdowns

OSCX vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSCX drawdown since its inception was -84.49%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCX and COTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSCXCOTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.49%

-25.69%

-58.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.76%

-21.71%

-15.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.75%

-8.42%

-47.33%

Volatility

OSCX vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSCXCOTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

150.38%

40.63%

+109.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

150.38%

40.63%

+109.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

150.38%

40.63%

+109.75%

OSCX vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSCX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

OSCX vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither OSCX nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


OSCX and COTG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for OSCX.

OSCX and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for OSCX and 0.75% for COTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSCX and COTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer