OSCV vs. SMMV
OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) and SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. OSCV is actively managed, while SMMV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OSCV returned 6.85%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for SMMV. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. OSCV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SMMV.
Performance
OSCV vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 9.33% return.
OSCV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- YTD
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 19.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.18%
SMMV
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 7.36%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.38M | $3.12M | $2.35M | |
| $337.38K | $347.17K | $431.55K |
OSCV vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 15.37% | 1.35% | 11.66% | 10.14% | -11.41% | 27.69% | 4.94% | 27.51% | -13.57% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 9.33% | 6.42% | 18.29% | 5.63% | -10.00% | 16.64% | -2.88% | 24.21% | -7.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between OSCV and SMMV is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between OSCV and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OSCV vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OSCV
SMMV
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
OSCV
SMMV
Industrials
OSCV
SMMV
Energy
OSCV
SMMV
Consumer Cyclical
OSCV
SMMV
Real Estate
OSCV
SMMV
Healthcare
OSCV
SMMV
Basic Materials
OSCV
SMMV
Utilities
OSCV
SMMV
Technology
OSCV
SMMV
Consumer Defensive
OSCV
SMMV
Communication Services
OSCV
-
SMMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OSCV vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank
OSCV
SMMV
OSCV vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OSCV | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.19 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.92 | 6.75 | +0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OSCV vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and SMMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSCV | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.40% | -38.77% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -7.02% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -13.68% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -18.00% | -4.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -1.07% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -5.04% | -2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.28% | +0.29% |
Volatility
OSCV vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.85%. This indicates that OSCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OSCV | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 2.85% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 6.98% | +2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.02% | 9.75% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 13.44% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 15.62% | +5.12% |
OSCV vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSCV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
OSCV vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison
OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than SMMV's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | 1.05% | 1.23% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.12% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.75% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OSCV and SMMV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OSCV has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to SMMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSCV dropped -42.40% vs SMMV's -38.77%.
On 5-year performance, OSCV leads with 6.85% vs 6.29% for SMMV. On fees, SMMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OSCV has performed better with a 6.85% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.
SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.05% for OSCV.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OSCV and 0.20% for SMMV.
SMMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OSCV and SMMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer