OSCV vs. JULB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OSCV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors, while JULB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OSCV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

OSCV vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than JULB's 6.38% return.

OSCV

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 16.60%
• 3Y*: 11.76%
• 5Y*: 6.15%
• 10Y*: —

JULB

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 6.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSCV vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	12.19%	0.09%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	6.38%	2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between OSCV and JULB is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

OSCV vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSCV

OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 41
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

JULB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSCV vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OSCV	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.42	—	—

Drawdowns

OSCV vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	OSCV	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.40%	-5.24%	-37.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.43%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.56%	-0.83%	-6.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OSCV	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.36%	6.84%	+6.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	6.84%	+10.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.85%	6.84%	+14.01%

OSCV vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSCV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

OSCV vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	1.07%	1.23%	1.29%	1.55%	1.12%	1.06%	1.11%	1.75%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OSCV and JULB in my portfolio?

OSCV and JULB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, OSCV or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OSCV or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OSCV or JULB?

OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.

What is the main difference between OSCV and JULB?

OSCV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while JULB is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OSCV and 0.25% for JULB.