PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSCV vs. DUBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSCV vs. DUBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than DUBS's 12.25% return.


OSCV

1D
0.09%
1M
0.78%
6M
9.38%
YTD
15.37%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.18%

DUBS

1D
0.84%
1M
0.82%
6M
11.02%
YTD
12.25%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$868.91K$1.23M$918.60K
$3.38M$3.12M$2.35M

OSCV vs. DUBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
OSCV
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
15.37%1.35%11.66%6.36%
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
12.25%19.28%24.08%7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between OSCV and DUBS is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2023

0.61

The correlation between OSCV and DUBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.61 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OSCV vs. DUBS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OSCV
DUBS

Financial Services

28.6%
11.5%

Industrials

12.6%
8.5%

Energy

11.4%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
9.6%

Real Estate

10.1%
1.8%

Healthcare

8.0%
8.9%

Basic Materials

6.0%
1.7%

Utilities

3.2%
2.2%

Technology

3.2%
38.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.5%

Communication Services

-

9.9%

Financial Services

OSCV
28.6%
DUBS
11.5%

Industrials

OSCV
12.6%
DUBS
8.5%

Energy

OSCV
11.4%
DUBS
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

OSCV
10.6%
DUBS
9.6%

Real Estate

OSCV
10.1%
DUBS
1.8%

Healthcare

OSCV
8.0%
DUBS
8.9%

Basic Materials

OSCV
6.0%
DUBS
1.7%

Utilities

OSCV
3.2%
DUBS
2.2%

Technology

OSCV
3.2%
DUBS
38.4%

Consumer Defensive

OSCV
2.3%
DUBS
4.5%

Communication Services

OSCV

-

DUBS
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSCV vs. DUBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OSCV
OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DUBS
DUBS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DUBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUBS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DUBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OSCV vs. DUBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSCVDUBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.90

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

12.48

-5.56

OSCV vs. DUBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the DUBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSCV and DUBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSCV vs. DUBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, which is greater than DUBS's maximum drawdown of -18.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and DUBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSCVDUBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.40%

-18.48%

-23.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-8.29%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-18.48%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.84%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-1.94%

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.92%

+0.65%

Volatility

OSCV vs. DUBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) is 3.02%, while Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF (DUBS) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that OSCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSCVDUBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

3.74%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

10.78%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

13.85%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

14.64%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

14.64%

+6.10%

OSCV vs. DUBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSCV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DUBS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

OSCV vs. DUBS - Dividend Comparison

OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than DUBS's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
1.99%2.06%2.52%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OSCV
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
1.05%1.23%1.29%1.55%1.12%1.06%1.11%1.75%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


OSCV and DUBS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUBS has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to OSCV (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSCV dropped -42.40% vs DUBS's -18.48%.

On 3-year performance, DUBS leads with 19.57% vs 10.19% for OSCV. On fees, DUBS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, OSCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DUBS has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUBS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.

DUBS has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.05% for OSCV.

OSCV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DUBS is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OSCV and 0.39% for DUBS.

DUBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSCV and DUBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer