PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSCV vs. DES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSCV vs. DES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly lower than DES's 22.71% return.


OSCV

1D
0.09%
1M
0.78%
6M
9.38%
YTD
15.37%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.18%

DES

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.86%
6M
14.79%
YTD
22.71%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
13.09%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
8.19%
ALL TIME*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.72M$4.61M$5.63M
$3.38M$3.12M$2.35M

OSCV vs. DES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OSCV
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
15.37%1.35%11.66%10.14%-11.41%27.69%4.94%27.51%-13.57%
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
22.71%0.25%9.93%16.50%-10.96%26.51%-4.26%20.26%-16.38%

Correlation

The correlation between OSCV and DES is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.92

The correlation between OSCV and DES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

OSCV vs. DES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OSCV
DES

Financial Services

28.6%
25.2%

Industrials

12.6%
13.6%

Energy

11.4%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
16.3%

Real Estate

10.1%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.0%
2.1%

Basic Materials

6.0%
6.1%

Utilities

3.2%
4.1%

Technology

3.2%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.1%

Communication Services

-

2.9%

Financial Services

OSCV
28.6%
DES
25.2%

Industrials

OSCV
12.6%
DES
13.6%

Energy

OSCV
11.4%
DES
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

OSCV
10.6%
DES
16.3%

Real Estate

OSCV
10.1%
DES
9.9%

Healthcare

OSCV
8.0%
DES
2.1%

Basic Materials

OSCV
6.0%
DES
6.1%

Utilities

OSCV
3.2%
DES
4.1%

Technology

OSCV
3.2%
DES
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

OSCV
2.3%
DES
4.1%

Communication Services

OSCV

-

DES
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSCV vs. DES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OSCV
OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DES
DES Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OSCV vs. DES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSCVDESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

4.03

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

12.16

-5.24

OSCV vs. DES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the DES Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSCV and DES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSCV vs. DES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, smaller than the maximum DES drawdown of -65.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and DES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSCVDESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.40%

-65.48%

+23.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-7.64%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-25.16%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

-25.16%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-1.54%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-9.61%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.53%

+0.04%

Volatility

OSCV vs. DES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) is 3.02%, while WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that OSCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSCVDESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

3.40%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

10.18%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

15.82%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

19.38%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

21.92%

-1.18%

OSCV vs. DES - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSCV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DES's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

OSCV vs. DES - Dividend Comparison

OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than DES's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.26%2.85%2.81%2.65%2.89%2.31%2.75%2.68%3.65%2.89%2.70%3.09%
OSCV
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
1.05%1.23%1.29%1.55%1.12%1.06%1.11%1.75%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OSCV and DES have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DES has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to OSCV (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSCV dropped -42.40% vs DES's -65.48%.

On 5-year performance, DES leads with 8.30% vs 6.85% for OSCV. On fees, DES is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, OSCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DES has performed better with a 8.30% return vs 6.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DES is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.

DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.05% for OSCV.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OSCV and 0.38% for DES.

DES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSCV and DES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer