PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSCV vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSCV vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with OSCV having a 9.18% return and CSB slightly higher at 9.49%.


OSCV

1D
0.45%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
9.18%
6M
8.64%
1Y
15.66%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*

CSB

1D
0.91%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
9.49%
6M
10.26%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSCV vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OSCV
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
9.18%1.35%11.66%10.14%-11.41%27.69%4.94%27.51%-13.52%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
9.49%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between OSCV and CSB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.88

The correlation between OSCV and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

OSCV vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OSCV
CSB

Financial Services

27.6%
26.5%

Industrials

17.0%
8.5%

Energy

11.3%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
19.0%

Real Estate

8.5%

-

Healthcare

8.3%
0.4%

Basic Materials

5.6%
3.4%

Utilities

3.1%
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
4.4%

Technology

2.0%
1.2%

Communication Services

-

3.6%

Financial Services

OSCV
27.6%
CSB
26.5%

Industrials

OSCV
17.0%
CSB
8.5%

Energy

OSCV
11.3%
CSB
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

OSCV
9.9%
CSB
19.0%

Real Estate

OSCV
8.5%
CSB

-

Healthcare

OSCV
8.3%
CSB
0.4%

Basic Materials

OSCV
5.6%
CSB
3.4%

Utilities

OSCV
3.1%
CSB
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

OSCV
2.0%
CSB
4.4%

Technology

OSCV
2.0%
CSB
1.2%

Communication Services

OSCV

-

CSB
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSCV vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSCV
OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSCV vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OSCVCSBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.46

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

2.22

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.81

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.97

8.15

-2.17

OSCV vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSCV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSCV and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OSCVCSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.46

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.21

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.45

-0.09

Drawdowns

OSCV vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, roughly equal to the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSCVCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.40%

-42.07%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-7.18%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-21.82%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

-24.49%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-2.05%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-7.14%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.47%

+0.08%

Volatility

OSCV vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSCVCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

3.62%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

9.12%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

14.52%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

18.78%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

21.31%

-0.40%

OSCV vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSCV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

OSCV vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than CSB's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.23%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
OSCV
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
1.10%1.23%1.29%1.55%1.12%1.06%1.11%1.75%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OSCV and CSB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSB has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to OSCV (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSCV dropped -42.40% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 5-year performance, OSCV leads with 5.36% vs 3.93% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OSCV has performed better with a 5.36% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.10% for OSCV.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OSCV and 0.35% for CSB.

CSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSCV and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer