PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSCG vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSCG vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long OSCR Daily ETF (OSCG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSCG achieves a 62.91% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's 2.80% return.


OSCG

1D
-5.93%
1M
16.15%
YTD
62.91%
6M
12.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDSQ

1D
0.01%
1M
1.59%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.86%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSCG vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OSCG and XDSQ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSCG vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSCG

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSCG vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long OSCR Daily ETF (OSCG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OSCG vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OSCGXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.69

-0.71

Drawdowns

OSCG vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSCG drawdown since its inception was -71.31%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCG and XDSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSCGXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.31%

-26.06%

-45.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.47%

0.00%

-36.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.25%

-4.96%

-32.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

Volatility

OSCG vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSCGXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

145.44%

10.56%

+134.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.44%

15.27%

+130.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.44%

15.10%

+130.34%

OSCG vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSCG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

OSCG vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither OSCG nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


OSCG and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OSCG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OSCG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDSQ.

OSCG and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for OSCG and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSCG and XDSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer