OSCBX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Overseas SMA Completion Portfolio (OSCBX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
OSCBX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Sep 11, 2019. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
OSCBX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OSCBX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSCBX Overseas SMA Completion Portfolio | -4.93% | 47.21% | 6.06% | 15.00% | -11.51% | 6.10% | 7.40% | 11.03% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -10.22% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 11.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OSCBX achieves a -4.93% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -10.22% return.
OSCBX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -13.56%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 26.19%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- —
CTCAX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -10.22%
- 6M
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 20.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OSCBX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OSCBX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OSCBX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
OSCBX
CTCAX
OSCBX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overseas SMA Completion Portfolio (OSCBX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OSCBX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 1.02 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 1.57 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.22 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.67 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.92 | 5.92 | +0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OSCBX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.02 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.49 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.70 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between OSCBX and CTCAX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
OSCBX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
OSCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than CTCAX's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSCBX Overseas SMA Completion Portfolio | 3.04% | 2.89% | 6.48% | 5.66% | 3.86% | 6.86% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.66% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
OSCBX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OSCBX drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCBX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OSCBX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.50% | -61.04% | +21.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.34% | -14.43% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.93% | -39.55% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.95% | -14.43% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -10.75% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 4.07% | -0.55% |
Volatility
OSCBX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Overseas SMA Completion Portfolio (OSCBX) is 6.49%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that OSCBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OSCBX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 7.45% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 16.24% | -5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.85% | 27.00% | -11.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 25.81% | -9.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 24.66% | -5.56% |