PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE.TO) and Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORE.TO achieves a 47.46% return, which is significantly higher than AAUC.TO's 15.42% return.


ORE.TO

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.85%
YTD
47.46%
6M
57.23%
1Y
81.25%
3Y*
26.81%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
9.96%

AAUC.TO

1D
1.97%
1M
-5.71%
YTD
15.42%
6M
18.43%
1Y
74.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ORE.TO
Orezone Gold Corporation
47.46%176.56%-24.71%-9.57%
AAUC.TO
Allied Gold Corporation
15.42%207.43%-2.85%-33.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ORE.TO and AAUC.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023

0.36

The correlation between ORE.TO and AAUC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ORE.TO:

CA$1.75B

AAUC.TO:

CA$4.55B

EPS

ORE.TO:

CA$0.14

AAUC.TO:

-CA$1.06

PS Ratio

ORE.TO:

3.45

AAUC.TO:

3.12

PB Ratio

ORE.TO:

3.22

AAUC.TO:

13.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

ORE.TO:

CA$478.80M

AAUC.TO:

CA$1.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ORE.TO:

CA$224.13M

AAUC.TO:

CA$543.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

ORE.TO:

CA$235.40M

AAUC.TO:

CA$331.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORE.TO
ORE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ORE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ORE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

AAUC.TO
AAUC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AAUC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAUC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAUC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AAUC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAUC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE.TO) and Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ORE.TOAAUC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.68

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

7.32

-2.26

ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the AAUC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORE.TO and AAUC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORE.TOAAUC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.70

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.67

-0.54

Drawdowns

ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORE.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.63%, which is greater than AAUC.TO's maximum drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORE.TO and AAUC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORE.TOAAUC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.63%

-50.73%

-44.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.99%

-28.00%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.21%

-16.93%

-31.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.00%

-22.05%

-48.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.29%

10.24%

+6.05%

Volatility

ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.97% compared to Allied Gold Corporation (AAUC.TO) at 11.73%. This indicates that ORE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAUC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORE.TOAAUC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.97%

11.73%

+3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.78%

21.72%

+25.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.47%

44.34%

+18.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.40%

54.02%

+4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.93%

54.02%

+9.91%

Dividends

ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ORE.TO nor AAUC.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Orezone Gold Corporation and Allied Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
182.89M
387.65M
(ORE.TO) Total Revenue
(AAUC.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

ORE.TO vs. AAUC.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Orezone Gold Corporation and Allied Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
51.1%
42.2%
Portfolio components
ORE.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orezone Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 93.46M and revenue of 182.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.1%.

AAUC.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 163.71M and revenue of 387.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.2%.

ORE.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orezone Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 85.37M and revenue of 182.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.7%.

AAUC.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 95.78M and revenue of 387.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

ORE.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orezone Gold Corporation reported a net income of 38.91M and revenue of 182.89M, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.

AAUC.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allied Gold Corporation reported a net income of -57.37M and revenue of 387.65M, resulting in a net margin of -14.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ORE.TO and AAUC.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORE.TO and AAUC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer