ORE.TO vs. LUG.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO).
Performance
ORE.TO vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ORE.TO vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORE.TO Orezone Gold Corporation | 35.03% | 176.56% | -24.71% | -32.54% | 5.00% | 9.09% | 66.67% | 15.79% | -19.72% | 33.96% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -2.23% | 291.32% | 91.60% | 29.57% | 30.62% | -4.67% | 31.21% | 66.93% | 10.15% | -13.88% |
Fundamentals
ORE.TO:
CA$1.52B
LUG.TO:
CA$26.71B
ORE.TO:
CA$0.11
LUG.TO:
CA$3.28
ORE.TO:
22.69
LUG.TO:
33.54
ORE.TO:
0.02
LUG.TO:
0.45
ORE.TO:
3.91
LUG.TO:
14.90
ORE.TO:
3.80
LUG.TO:
19.61
ORE.TO:
CA$378.63M
LUG.TO:
CA$1.79B
ORE.TO:
CA$169.23M
LUG.TO:
CA$1.26B
ORE.TO:
CA$180.77M
LUG.TO:
CA$1.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ORE.TO achieves a 35.03% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ORE.TO has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 17.41%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 39.15% annualized return.
ORE.TO
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- 35.03%
- 6M
- 63.70%
- 1Y
- 154.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.01%
- 10Y*
- 17.41%
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -11.43%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- 23.08%
- 1Y
- 160.60%
- 3Y*
- 99.01%
- 5Y*
- 65.44%
- 10Y*
- 39.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORE.TO vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ORE.TO
LUG.TO
ORE.TO vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE.TO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ORE.TO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 2.73 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 2.77 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 6.33 | -1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.65 | 18.18 | -8.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ORE.TO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.73 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 1.45 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.90 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.00 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between ORE.TO and LUG.TO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ORE.TO vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison
ORE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LUG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORE.TO Orezone Gold Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 4.53% | 3.37% | 2.69% | 3.28% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
ORE.TO vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORE.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.63%, roughly equal to the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -95.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORE.TO and LUG.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORE.TO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.63% | -95.45% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.65% | -25.33% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.96% | -38.94% | -29.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.35% | -41.84% | -39.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.58% | -13.30% | -39.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.18% | -65.22% | -5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.92% | 8.82% | +6.10% |
Volatility
ORE.TO vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Orezone Gold Corporation (ORE.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.22% compared to Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) at 19.07%. This indicates that ORE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ORE.TO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.22% | 19.07% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.83% | 43.72% | +7.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.59% | 59.10% | +10.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.89% | 45.56% | +13.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.17% | 43.62% | +21.55% |
Financials
ORE.TO vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Orezone Gold Corporation and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ORE.TO vs. LUG.TO - Profitability Comparison
ORE.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Orezone Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 64.27M and revenue of 132.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.
LUG.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 359.14M and revenue of 534.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
ORE.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Orezone Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 61.53M and revenue of 132.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.5%.
LUG.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 334.43M and revenue of 534.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.6%.
ORE.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Orezone Gold Corporation reported a net income of 28.01M and revenue of 132.46M, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.
LUG.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 237.81M and revenue of 534.69M, resulting in a net margin of 44.5%.