ORCX vs. MULL
ORCX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ORCX returned 15.78% vs 6074.28% for MULL. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ORCX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
ORCX vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ORCX achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.
ORCX
- 1D
- -11.49%
- 1M
- 55.88%
- YTD
- 16.25%
- 6M
- -1.67%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ORCX vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ORCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF | 16.25% | -16.20% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 479.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORCX and MULL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2025 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ORCX and MULL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ORCX vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ORCX
MULL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ORCX
MULL
Basic Materials
ORCX
-
MULL
-
Communication Services
ORCX
-
MULL
-
Consumer Cyclical
ORCX
-
MULL
-
Consumer Defensive
ORCX
-
MULL
-
Energy
ORCX
-
MULL
-
Financial Services
ORCX
-
MULL
-
Healthcare
ORCX
-
MULL
-
Industrials
ORCX
-
MULL
-
Real Estate
ORCX
-
MULL
-
Utilities
ORCX
-
MULL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORCX vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
ORCX
MULL
ORCX vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ORCX | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -46.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.89 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 116.34 | -116.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | 390.40 | -390.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ORCX | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 46.71 | -46.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 7.45 | -7.47 |
Drawdowns
ORCX vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORCX drawdown since its inception was -85.98%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORCX and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORCX | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.98% | -72.29% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.98% | -53.09% | -32.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.17% | 0.00% | -64.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.40% | -20.62% | -23.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.49% | 15.79% | +41.70% |
Volatility
ORCX vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) is 36.85%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that ORCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORCX | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.85% | 55.41% | -18.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 82.26% | 105.59% | -23.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 127.97% | 132.38% | -4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 121.00% | 136.22% | -15.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 121.00% | 136.22% | -15.22% |
ORCX vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ORCX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ORCX vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
ORCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
ORCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ORCX and MULL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to ORCX (36.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORCX dropped -85.98% vs MULL's -72.29%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 15.78% for ORCX. On fees, ORCX is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, ORCX has been the lower-risk option at 36.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 15.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ORCX is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for ORCX.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for ORCX and 1.50% for MULL.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ORCX and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer