ORCX vs. CONL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ORCX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF) and CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ORCX returned 15.78% vs -79.34% for CONL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ORCX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for CONL.

Performance

ORCX vs. CONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORCX achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -62.12% return.

ORCX

• 1D: -11.49%
• 1M: 55.88%
• YTD: 16.25%
• 6M: -1.67%
• 1Y: 15.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONL

• 1D: -12.32%
• 1M: -38.47%
• YTD: -62.12%
• 6M: -75.31%
• 1Y: -79.34%
• 3Y*: -14.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORCX vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ORCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF	16.25%	-16.20%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-62.12%	-64.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ORCX and CONL is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2025	0.43

ORCX vs. CONL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ORCX	CONL
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ORCX vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORCX

ORCX Risk / Return Rank: 15
ORCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ORCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ORCX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
ORCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ORCX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 3
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORCX vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ORCX	CONL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	-0.57	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	-0.65	+1.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.93	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	-0.86	+1.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	-1.21	+1.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ORCX vs. CONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the CONL Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORCX and CONL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ORCX	CONL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12	-0.57	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	-0.20	+0.18

Drawdowns

ORCX vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORCX drawdown since its inception was -85.98%, smaller than the maximum CONL drawdown of -93.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORCX and CONL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ORCX	CONL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.98%	-93.95%	+7.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.98%	-92.02%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-93.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.17%	-93.48%	+29.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.40%	-55.95%	+11.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	57.49%	65.74%	-8.25%

Volatility

ORCX vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) have volatilities of 36.85% and 38.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ORCX	CONL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	36.85%	38.02%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	82.26%	101.03%	-18.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	127.97%	139.40%	-11.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	121.00%	149.93%	-28.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.00%	149.93%	-28.93%

ORCX vs. CONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORCX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CONL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ORCX vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison

Neither ORCX nor CONL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%
ORCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ORCX and CONL in my portfolio?

ORCX and CONL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ORCX or CONL?

CONL has higher volatility (38.02%) compared to ORCX (36.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORCX dropped -85.98% vs CONL's -93.95%.

Which ETF is better, ORCX or CONL?

On 1-year performance, ORCX leads with 15.78% vs -79.34% for CONL. On fees, CONL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, ORCX has been the lower-risk option at 36.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ORCX or CONL?

Over the 1-year period, ORCX has performed better with a 15.78% return vs -79.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ORCX or CONL?

CONL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for ORCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ORCX or CONL?

ORCX and CONL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ORCX and CONL?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for ORCX and 1.15% for CONL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ORCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.