PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ORBX vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ORBX vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ORBX

1D
-7.31%
1M
23.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORBX vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ORBX and XYLD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ORBX vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORBX

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORBX vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ORBX vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ORBXXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.31

0.60

+3.71

Drawdowns

ORBX vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORBX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORBX and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORBXXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-33.46%

+14.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.53%

-0.15%

-18.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-3.72%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

Volatility

ORBX vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORBXXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.41%

6.55%

+72.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.41%

11.22%

+68.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.41%

14.21%

+65.20%

ORBX vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ORBX vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

ORBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ORBX
Global X Space Tech ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


ORBX and XYLD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ORBX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ORBX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 0.00% for ORBX.

ORBX is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while XYLD is Derivative Income. ORBX tracks Global X Space Tech Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ORBX and 0.60% for XYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ORBX and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer