ORBX vs. WAR
ORBX (Global X Space Tech ETF) and WAR (U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. ORBX is passively managed, while WAR is actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ORBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for WAR.
Performance
ORBX vs. WAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ORBX
- 1D
- -7.31%
- 1M
- 23.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAR
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ORBX vs. WAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | -15.08% |
WAR U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORBX and WAR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORBX vs. WAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX) and U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ORBX | WAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.31 | 5.18 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
ORBX vs. WAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORBX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, which is greater than WAR's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORBX and WAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORBX | WAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -1.92% | -16.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.53% | -1.92% | -16.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -0.88% | -4.13% |
Volatility
ORBX vs. WAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORBX | WAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.41% | 42.90% | +36.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.41% | 42.90% | +36.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.41% | 42.90% | +36.51% |
ORBX vs. WAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ORBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WAR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ORBX vs. WAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ORBX nor WAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ORBX and WAR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ORBX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ORBX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WAR.
ORBX and WAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and US Global. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ORBX and 0.60% for WAR.
Find the right allocation for ORBX and WAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer