ORBX vs. URA
ORBX (Global X Space Tech ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ORBX is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Space Tech Index, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ORBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.
Performance
ORBX vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ORBX
- 1D
- -7.31%
- 1M
- 23.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- 17.93%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 61.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.27%
- 5Y*
- 21.39%
- 10Y*
- 17.12%
ORBX vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | 22.02% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | -8.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ORBX and URA is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ORBX vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
ORBX
URA
ORBX vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Space Tech ETF (ORBX) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ORBX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.31 | -0.05 | +4.36 |
Drawdowns
ORBX vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ORBX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORBX and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ORBX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -93.54% | +75.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.53% | -42.81% | +24.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -75.01% | +70.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.40% | — |
Volatility
ORBX vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ORBX | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.41% | 50.19% | +29.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.41% | 43.62% | +35.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.41% | 37.73% | +41.68% |
ORBX vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ORBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ORBX vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
ORBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ORBX Global X Space Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.14% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ORBX and URA have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ORBX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ORBX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 0.00% for ORBX.
ORBX is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. ORBX tracks Global X Space Tech Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ORBX and 0.69% for URA.
Find the right allocation for ORBX and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer